Management of Chronic Non-Bacterial Osteomyelitis (CNO)
The best management approach for chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) follows a stepwise algorithm starting with NSAIDs/COXIBs as first-line therapy, advancing to intravenous bisphosphonates or TNF inhibitors as second-line options, and referral to specialized centers for third-line treatments in refractory cases. 1
Diagnosis and Initial Assessment
- CNO is characterized by sterile bone inflammation that may affect multiple sites
- Key diagnostic imaging:
- MRI is the preferred initial imaging modality
- Alternative: CT combined with nuclear imaging
- Consider whole-body imaging for diagnostic and prognostic purposes 1
- Rule out infection through appropriate cultures if fever or significantly elevated inflammatory markers are present
- Bone biopsy is not routinely recommended unless there is suspicion of malignancy or infectious osteomyelitis 1
Treatment Algorithm
First-Line Treatment
- NSAIDs/COXIBs at maximum tolerated and approved dosage
- Options include naproxen, indomethacin, ibuprofen, celecoxib, etoricoxib, piroxicam, and meloxicam
- Evaluate response at 2-4 weeks:
- If sufficient response: continue and re-evaluate at 12 weeks
- If sustained improvement at 12 weeks: consider tapering to on-demand treatment
- If insufficient response: consider NSAID/COXIB rotation or advance to second-line treatment 1
Special Considerations for First-Line Treatment
- Consider directly advancing to second-line treatment in patients with:
- Spinal bone lesions with risk of vertebral collapse
- Significant accumulated skeletal damage 1
Second-Line Treatment
- Preferred option: Intravenous bisphosphonates (IVBP)
- Alternative: TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi)
- Choice between IVBP and TNFi should be individualized based on:
- Presence of additional inflammatory features
- Patient-specific factors
- Evaluate response at 3-6 months:
- If sufficient response: consider tapering after 6-12 months of sustained improvement
- If insufficient response: add or replace with the alternative second-line option (TNFi if on IVBP or vice versa) 1
Third-Line Treatment
- Refer patients with insufficient response to both IVBP and TNFi to an expert center
- Various third-line options may be considered based on individual patient characteristics 1
Supportive Measures Throughout All Treatment Stages
- Patient education and lifestyle recommendations
- Consider physiotherapy to maintain function and mobility
- Dental examination (particularly important with bisphosphonate therapy)
- Short courses of oral prednisolone or intra-articular glucocorticoid injections may be used as bridging options
- Avoid long-term use of glucocorticoids 1
Monitoring and Follow-Up
- Treatment success assessment:
- Pain reduction and improved function
- Radiological assessment (MRI or CT combined with nuclear imaging)
- Laboratory monitoring of inflammatory markers if previously elevated 1
- Be aware of potential complications:
- Neurovascular complications in patients with anterior chest wall involvement
- Risk of vertebral fractures in patients with spinal involvement
- Monitor for adverse treatment effects according to established guidelines 1
Treatment Efficacy and Prognosis
- NSAIDs are effective in many patients, with studies showing symptom-free status in up to 43% after 6 months 2
- Radiological relapses may occur in up to 41% of patients, but approximately two-thirds of these may be clinically silent 2
- For NSAID-refractory cases, bisphosphonates have shown disease remission in some patients, while TNF inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab) have demonstrated effectiveness in cases with inadequate response to bisphosphonates 3
Pitfalls and Caveats
- CNO is often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as bacterial osteomyelitis, leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment
- Long-term NSAID use can cause gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular adverse effects, especially in elderly patients 4
- Relapses and new radiological lesions can occur at any time and at any site in the skeleton, necessitating ongoing monitoring even during periods of clinical remission 2
- The disease may be self-limiting in some cases, but more aggressive treatment may be needed to prevent long-term bone damage 5