What is the recommended approach for writing a case series on the surgical management of Choledochal cysts in children?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Writing a Case Series on Choledochal Cysts in Children: A Structured Approach

The most effective approach for writing a case series on pediatric choledochal cysts is to follow a standardized format that includes detailed surgical technique, outcomes, and complications, with particular emphasis on laparoscopic versus open approaches.

Background Information to Include

Definition and Classification

  • Use the Todani classification system to categorize your cases:
    • Type I: Dilatation of extrahepatic bile duct (most common in children)
    • Type II: Diverticulum of extrahepatic bile duct
    • Type III: Choledochocele
    • Type IV: Multiple cysts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic)
    • Type V: Multiple intrahepatic cysts (Caroli disease)

Epidemiology

  • Highlight that choledochal cysts are rare congenital disorders with higher prevalence in Asian populations
  • Note the female predominance (approximately 80% of cases) 1
  • Emphasize that while traditionally considered a pediatric disease, many cases are now diagnosed in adulthood 2

Case Series Structure

Patient Demographics

  • Include age at presentation, gender, presenting symptoms
  • Document duration of symptoms before diagnosis
  • Note that children are more likely to present with jaundice (31.9%) compared to adults (11.6%) 1
  • Document any cases with the classic triad (abdominal pain, jaundice, and abdominal mass), though this is uncommon in modern presentations 2

Diagnostic Workup

  • Detail imaging modalities used for each case:
    • Ultrasound as initial screening tool
    • MRCP as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis
    • Document any use of CT scans
    • Note any preoperative interventions (ERCP, PTC)
  • Include key diagnostic findings that confirmed choledochal cyst and its type
  • Document presence of anomalous pancreaticobiliary union (APBDU) if identified 3

Surgical Management

  • Describe your surgical approach in detail:
    • Patient positioning
    • Port placement for laparoscopic cases
    • Surgical steps including:
      • Complete excision of the cyst
      • Hepaticojejunostomy technique
      • Cholecystectomy
    • Any technical challenges encountered
  • Compare your approach with current recommendations:
    • Complete excision is the standard of care to prevent malignant transformation 4, 5
    • Internal drainage procedures are associated with higher complication rates 5

Outcomes and Follow-up

  • Document immediate postoperative outcomes:
    • Length of hospital stay
    • Time to oral feeding
    • Postoperative complications
  • Include long-term follow-up data:
    • Incidence of cholangitis
    • Any cases of biliary stricture
    • Liver function tests
    • Quality of life assessment

Critical Elements for Publication

Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Approaches

  • Compare your laparotomy cases with published data on laparoscopic approaches
  • Discuss advantages and disadvantages of each approach:
    • Operative time
    • Blood loss
    • Cosmetic results
    • Learning curve
    • Technical challenges

Complications and Their Management

  • Document all complications encountered:
    • Bile leak
    • Anastomotic stricture
    • Cholangitis
    • Pancreatitis
  • Describe how each complication was managed

Lessons Learned

  • Highlight key technical considerations:
    • Importance of complete cyst excision to prevent malignancy 5
    • Techniques to identify and preserve the hepatic artery
    • Methods to ensure tension-free hepaticojejunostomy
  • Discuss any modifications to technique made during your experience

Presentation Format for Conference

Visual Elements

  • Include high-quality intraoperative photographs
  • Create diagrams showing:
    • Port placement
    • Key anatomical landmarks
    • Reconstruction technique
  • Present pre- and post-operative imaging for comparison

Data Presentation

  • Use tables to summarize:
    • Patient demographics
    • Presenting symptoms
    • Operative details (time, blood loss)
    • Outcomes and complications
  • Include statistical analysis if appropriate for your sample size

Discussion Points

  • Address the critical view of safety concept during dissection 6
  • Discuss management of difficult cases:
    • Extensive inflammation
    • Previous interventions
    • Anatomical variations
  • Compare your results with published literature

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Incomplete cyst excision: Emphasize the importance of complete excision to prevent malignant transformation (risk remains higher than general population even after excision) 3
  • Bile duct injury: Discuss techniques to avoid injury to hepatic ducts during dissection
  • Anastomotic stricture: Highlight technical considerations for creating a wide, tension-free hepaticojejunostomy
  • Inadequate follow-up: Stress the importance of long-term surveillance due to continued risk of malignancy (3.3% of patients develop biliary cancer during follow-up) 1

Conclusion

When preparing your case series, focus on standardized reporting of technical details, outcomes, and complications. The value of your contribution will be in the detailed description of your surgical approach, management of complications, and long-term outcomes. This structured approach will maximize the educational impact of your presentation at the pediatric surgery conference.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.