What type of study is it when a doctor designs a form and has patients fill it out for a rare disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

The correct answer is B. Cross sectional, as this study design involves collecting data from patients at a single point in time through a form designed by the doctor, providing a "snapshot" of the rare disease in the patient population. Cross-sectional studies are particularly useful for rare diseases as they allow researchers to gather information about disease prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors simultaneously. Unlike cohort studies which follow subjects over time to observe outcomes, or qualitative studies which focus on non-numerical data and subjective experiences, this scenario describes a typical cross-sectional approach where the doctor created a standardized form to collect patient data at one specific moment. According to 1, the basic epidemiological study designs are cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies provide a snapshot of a population by determining both exposures and outcomes at one time point.

Some may argue that other study designs could be applicable, but given the specifics of the scenario, cross-sectional is the most appropriate design. The key characteristics of cross-sectional studies, as described in 1, make them well-suited for studying rare diseases. While other studies, such as 2, 3, 4, and 5, provide valuable information on various aspects of research and study design, they do not directly address the question at hand.

In real-life clinical medicine, cross-sectional studies are often the most practical and efficient way to gather information about rare diseases, as they do not require long-term follow-up or extensive resources. By using a standardized form to collect data, researchers can quickly and easily gather information about the disease, which can then be used to inform treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. Overall, the cross-sectional design is the best choice for studying rare diseases in this scenario, as it provides a snapshot of the disease at a single point in time and allows researchers to gather valuable information about disease prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors.

References

Research

Introduction to Epidemiological Studies.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018

Research

Parkinson's disease.

Lancet (London, England), 2021

Research

A simplified guide to randomized controlled trials.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.