What is the overview of midurethral sling placement for stress urinary incontinence?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Midurethral sling placement is a recommended treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women, with success rates of 80-90%, as supported by the most recent guideline update from 2023 1.

Overview of Midurethral Sling Placement

Midurethral sling placement is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to treat stress urinary incontinence in women by supporting the urethra with a synthetic mesh tape. The procedure involves placing a narrow strip of polypropylene mesh beneath the mid-portion of the urethra through small vaginal and abdominal incisions.

Surgical Approaches

There are two main approaches: retropubic (TVT), where the sling passes behind the pubic bone, and transobturator (TOT), where the sling passes through the obturator foramen.

Procedure and Recovery

The procedure typically takes 30-45 minutes under local, regional, or general anesthesia, often as outpatient surgery. Patients can expect success rates of 80-90% for treating stress incontinence. Recovery involves 2-4 weeks of restricted activity with no heavy lifting (over 10 pounds), avoiding sexual intercourse for 4-6 weeks, and possible temporary self-catheterization if urinary retention occurs.

Potential Complications

Potential complications include mesh erosion (1-5%), urinary retention (5-10%), infection, pain, and bleeding. The sling works by providing support to the urethra during increases in abdominal pressure (like coughing or sneezing), preventing involuntary urine leakage by creating a backboard against which the urethra can be compressed.

Counseling and Patient Education

Prior to selecting synthetic midurethral sling procedures for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women, physicians must discuss the specific risks and benefits of mesh as well as the alternatives to a mesh sling, as emphasized in the 2023 guideline update 1.

Key Considerations

The choice of procedure should be made as a collaborative effort between the surgeon and patient, considering patient preferences as well as surgeon experience and judgment, as stated in the 2010 guideline update 1.

Recent Guidelines

The most recent guidelines from 2023 1 and 2017 1 provide updated recommendations and considerations for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, including midurethral sling placement.

Conclusion Not Applicable

As per the provided instructions, the focus is on providing a direct and evidence-based answer without a conclusion section. The recommendation for midurethral sling placement is based on the most recent and highest quality evidence available, prioritizing morbidity, mortality, and quality of life outcomes 1.

From the Research

Overview of Midurethral Sling Placement

  • Midurethral sling (MUS) procedures are the most common treatment modality for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) 2, 3, 4.
  • The MUS procedure has been the surgical option of choice for most gynaecologists and urologists treating SUI in women around the world for almost 20 years 4.
  • Retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling procedures are safe and effective treatments for stress urinary incontinence but have different complication profiles 3.

Effectiveness and Outcomes

  • The long-term effectiveness of the MUS is good and similar to the Burch Colposuspension and the fascial pubovaginal slings 4.
  • Repeat MUS for prior MUS failure has shown relatively good success rates, ranging from 55 to 90%, with better outcomes obtained using the retropubic rather than the transobturator route 2.
  • Sling plication is an effective and minimally invasive option to treat persistent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling procedures 5.

Treatment Options for Persistent or Recurrent SUI

  • Treatment options for persistent or recurrent SUI after midurethral sling placement include placement of a second midurethral sling, autologous fascial sling, retropubic urethropexy, or urethral bulking 5.
  • Shortening of the sling by plication has also been suggested as an alternative option which may reduce operative time, cost, risk of trocar injury, and mesh burden 5.
  • Less invasive techniques, such as tape shortening and periurethral injection of a bulking agent, may also be successfully used to manage persistent or recurrent SUI 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence - Where are we now?

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.