What is the most likely finding on an MRI of the cervical spine in a 3-year-old boy who presented with initial paralysis and apnea after a high-speed motor vehicle collision, but now has a normal neurologic exam and normal head and cervical spine computed tomography (CT) scans?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Injury to Spinal Cord at C3-C4 is Most Likely on MRI in a Child with Transient Paralysis After Trauma

The most likely finding on MRI of the cervical spine in this 3-year-old boy would be an injury to the spinal cord at C3-C4, despite normal neurologic exam and normal CT scans. This represents a case of Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnormality (SCIWORA), which is more common in the pediatric population.

Rationale for C3-C4 Injury

  1. Clinical Presentation Suggestive of Upper Cervical Injury:

    • The transient quadriplegia and apnea strongly suggest upper cervical cord involvement
    • C3-C4 is a critical region for respiratory function (phrenic nerve originates from C3-C5)
    • The temporary apnea requiring bag-mask ventilation is highly consistent with a transient injury at this level 1
  2. Age-Related Considerations:

    • Children are particularly susceptible to SCIWORA due to:
      • Greater elasticity of the pediatric spine
      • Relatively large head-to-body ratio
      • Underdeveloped neck musculature
      • Horizontal facet joints
  3. Normal CT Findings Despite Neurological Symptoms:

    • CT is excellent for detecting bony injuries but has limited sensitivity for soft tissue and cord injuries 1
    • MRI is the modality of choice in children who fulfill criteria for myelopathy or SCIWORA 1

Imaging Findings in SCIWORA

  • MRI may reveal:

    • Spinal cord edema
    • Contusion
    • Hemorrhage
    • Partial or complete cord transection
    • Ligamentous injury
  • These findings are typically seen at the level corresponding to the neurological deficit 1

Why Other Options Are Less Likely

  1. Injury at C6-C7:

    • Less likely to cause quadriplegia and respiratory compromise
    • Respiratory dysfunction typically involves levels C3-C5 where the phrenic nerve originates 2
  2. Injury at T4-T5:

    • Too low to explain quadriplegia or respiratory compromise
    • Would not typically cause upper extremity paralysis
  3. Normal MRI:

    • While possible, the transient but severe neurological deficits (quadriplegia and apnea) strongly suggest a real cord injury that would be visible on MRI
    • Studies show that children with normal radiography and CT may have signs of traumatic cervical injury on MRI 1

Clinical Implications

  • MRI is the modality of choice in children with suspected spinal cord injury despite normal CT findings 1
  • The United Kingdom's National Institute for Health Care Excellence guidelines suggest that in children <16 years of age, cervical MRI should be the first imaging modality for suspected spinal cord injury 1
  • Fat-saturated T2 sequences are particularly useful for detecting soft tissue injuries 1

Management Considerations

  • Despite normal neurological examination now, the history of transient quadriplegia and apnea warrants:
    • MRI evaluation to assess for cord injury
    • Consideration of cervical collar immobilization until definitive assessment
    • Close neurological monitoring for delayed deterioration

The high-speed mechanism, transient quadriplegia, and respiratory compromise in this pediatric patient strongly point to an upper cervical cord injury at C3-C4, which would be detectable on MRI despite normal CT findings and current normal examination.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.