What is the most appropriate next step in diagnosing a 54-year-old woman with progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness, absent Achilles and patellar reflexes, intact sensation, and strength of 3/5, after an unremarkable Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the thoracolumbar spine?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lumbar Puncture is the Most Appropriate Next Diagnostic Step

The most appropriate next step in diagnosing this 54-year-old woman with progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness, absent reflexes, intact sensation, and 3/5 strength is a lumbar puncture.

Clinical Presentation Analysis

This patient presents with a clinical picture highly suspicious for Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS):

  • Progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness over one week
  • Areflexia (absent Achilles and patellar reflexes)
  • Intact sensation
  • Normal MRI of the thoracolumbar spine

These findings represent the classic triad of GBS: progressive weakness, areflexia, and relatively preserved sensation.

Diagnostic Approach

Why Lumbar Puncture is Indicated:

  • Lumbar puncture is a critical diagnostic test for GBS, which typically shows albuminocytologic dissociation (elevated protein with normal cell count) 1
  • The diagnostic criteria for GBS include increased protein level in cerebrospinal fluid as a feature that strongly supports diagnosis 1
  • An unremarkable MRI of the thoracolumbar spine has already ruled out structural causes of the symptoms, making GBS more likely

Why Other Options are Less Appropriate:

  1. CT Myelogram:

    • Not indicated as first-line when MRI is already normal
    • Typically reserved for cases where MRI is contraindicated or inconclusive 1
    • Unnecessary additional radiation exposure
  2. Edrophonium Test:

    • Used to diagnose myasthenia gravis, which typically presents with fluctuating weakness and ocular symptoms
    • Patient's presentation with progressive weakness and areflexia is inconsistent with myasthenia gravis
  3. MRI of the Brain:

    • Not indicated as the primary next step for suspected peripheral neuropathy
    • Would be more appropriate if there were signs of central nervous system involvement
  4. Pulmonary Function Tests:

    • While important in monitoring GBS progression, they are not diagnostic
    • Should be performed after establishing the diagnosis in patients with GBS to monitor for respiratory compromise

Diagnostic Value of Lumbar Puncture

Lumbar puncture in GBS typically reveals:

  • Elevated protein levels with normal cell count (albuminocytologic dissociation)
  • Normal glucose levels
  • Absence of infectious markers 1

The cerebrospinal fluid analysis will help:

  • Confirm the diagnosis of GBS
  • Rule out infectious causes of polyradiculoneuropathy
  • Distinguish from other causes of acute flaccid paralysis

Safety Considerations

Lumbar puncture is a safe procedure when:

  • There is no evidence of increased intracranial pressure
  • No mass lesions are present
  • Proper technique is followed 2, 3

The patient's normal MRI of the thoracolumbar spine already suggests the absence of structural abnormalities that would contraindicate a lumbar puncture.

Conclusion

Based on the clinical presentation of progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness, areflexia, and intact sensation with a normal thoracolumbar MRI, a lumbar puncture is the most appropriate next diagnostic step to confirm GBS and rule out other potential causes of the patient's symptoms.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.