MRI of the Lumbar Spine with Contrast is the Most Appropriate Next Step for This Patient
MRI of the lumbar spine with contrast is the most appropriate next step in evaluating this 66-year-old man with low back pain, history of prostate cancer, and neurological deficits.
Rationale for MRI with Contrast
The patient presents with several concerning features that warrant immediate advanced imaging:
- History of prostate cancer - Currently on hormone therapy after radiation treatment
- Neurological deficits - Reduced sensation in right anterior thigh and muscle weakness (3/5 with knee flexion on the right)
- Midline tenderness in the midlumbar spine
Evidence Supporting MRI with Contrast
According to the ACR Appropriateness Criteria for Low Back Pain (2021), MRI lumbar spine without and with IV contrast is the preferred imaging modality for patients with:
- Low back pain with or without radiculopathy
- Suspicion of cancer
- History of malignancy 1
The guidelines specifically state that "In a patient suspected of having cancer, MRI without and with IV contrast is considered superior in evaluation of localizing disease (intramedullary, intradural-extramedullary, and extradural) as well as assessing extent of the lesion" 1.
Why MRI with Contrast is Superior to Other Options
MRI vs. CT Without Contrast
While CT lumbar spine without contrast can evaluate osseous integrity (e.g., pathologic fracture), it has significant limitations:
- Intradural and spinal cord pathologies are poorly depicted on CT
- MRI offers greater specificity with comparable sensitivity and provides better anatomic detail 1
MRI vs. X-ray
Radiography has very limited utility in this case:
- At least half of the bone must be eroded before changes are noticeable on radiographs 1
- Cannot adequately visualize soft tissue involvement or neural compression
MRI vs. Electromyography
- EMG would only provide functional information about nerve damage
- It would not identify the underlying cause or extent of compression
- Delaying imaging for neurological consultation could postpone urgent treatment if metastatic disease is present
Clinical Significance of Prostate Cancer Metastasis
Prostate cancer has a high propensity for spinal metastasis:
- 15-30% of metastases result from prostate cancer cells traveling through Batson's plexus to the lumbar spine 2
- Metastatic disease in the lumbar area can cause spinal cord compression requiring immediate treatment 2
Management Algorithm
Immediate MRI with contrast to evaluate for:
- Metastatic disease to the spine
- Epidural spinal cord compression
- Extent of neural involvement
If MRI is contraindicated:
- CT myelography would be the next best option to assess patency of the spinal canal/thecal sac 1
If metastatic disease is confirmed:
- Immediate treatment with intravenous corticosteroids
- Urgent oncology consultation
- Pain management
- Consideration for radiation therapy or surgical intervention
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
- Do not delay imaging - Spinal cord compression from metastatic disease is an oncologic emergency requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment
- Avoid lumbar puncture if spinal metastasis is suspected - There are reported cases of spinal coning after lumbar puncture in patients with asymptomatic vertebral metastasis from prostate cancer 3
- Recognize that neurological deficits may progress rapidly - Untreated spinal metastasis can lead to permanent neurological deficits and decreased quality of life 4
In this case, the patient's history of prostate cancer combined with new neurological deficits strongly suggests metastatic disease requiring urgent evaluation with MRI with contrast to guide appropriate management and prevent further neurological deterioration.