Role of Uterine Ablation in Treating Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Endometrial ablation should be considered for women with heavy menstrual bleeding who have completed childbearing and have failed medical management after a 3-6 month adequate trial. 1
First-Line Treatment Options
Before considering endometrial ablation, medical management should be attempted first:
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS):
Other Medical Options:
Role of Endometrial Ablation
Indications
- Second-line treatment after failed medical management (3-6 months trial) 1
- Appropriate for women who have completed childbearing 1
- Offers uterine preservation with fewer complications compared to hysterectomy 1
- Alternative to hysterectomy for women desiring uterine preservation 3
Effectiveness
- Provides equivalent efficacy to first-generation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding 4
- Comparable rates of amenorrhea to first-generation techniques 4
- May be less effective than LNG-IUS in reducing bleeding at 12 and 24 months 2
Types of Ablation Techniques
- First-generation techniques: Require hysteroscopic visualization (endometrial laser ablation, transcervical resection of endometrium, rollerball ablation) 4
- Second-generation techniques: Do not require hysteroscopic visualization (thermal balloon, microwave, hydrothermal, bipolar radiofrequency, cryotherapy) 4
Limitations and Complications
- Approximately 20% of women require hysterectomy within 2 years 5
- 3-5% require repeat ablation procedures 5
- Risk of post-ablation pain and treatment failure, especially in women with history of tubal ligation and dysmenorrhea 3
- Poor pregnancy outcomes if pregnancy occurs after ablation (continuing contraception recommended) 5
- Risk of masking endometrial cancer 3
Comparison with Hysterectomy
- Endometrial ablation has shorter recovery time compared to open hysterectomy (21 days faster return to normal activity) 6
- Hysterectomy is definitive treatment with higher quality of life and fewer complications long-term 3
- Approximately 13% of women who undergo endometrial ablation require further surgery for treatment failure 6
- Hysterectomy should be considered when ablation fails or when significant intracavitary lesions are present 1
Patient Selection for Optimal Outcomes
- Best candidates: Women who have completed childbearing and failed medical management 1
- Poor candidates: Women with history of tubal ligation and dysmenorrhea (higher risk of post-ablation pain and failure) 3
- Contraindications: Desire for future fertility, active endometrial or cervical infection, endometrial hyperplasia, or malignancy 1
Decision Algorithm
- Confirm heavy menstrual bleeding using PALM-COEIN classification system 1
- Rule out structural causes with transvaginal ultrasound 1
- Try medical management first (LNG-IUS preferred) for 3-6 months 1
- If medical management fails and patient has completed childbearing, consider endometrial ablation 1
- If ablation fails or is contraindicated, consider hysterectomy 1
Endometrial ablation offers a less invasive alternative to hysterectomy with faster recovery, but patients should be counseled about potential treatment failure rates and the possible need for additional procedures in the future.