Heart Failure Staging for a Patient with EF <28%
A patient with an ejection fraction (EF) of less than 28% has Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), which is classified as Stage C heart failure according to the most recent ACC/AHA guidelines. 1, 2
Classification of Heart Failure by Ejection Fraction
Heart failure is categorized based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as follows:
- HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction): LVEF ≤40%
- HFmrEF (Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction): LVEF 41-49%
- HFpEF (Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction): LVEF ≥50%
With an EF <28%, this patient clearly falls into the HFrEF category, which is defined as LVEF ≤40% according to the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines 1.
Staging of Heart Failure
The ACC/AHA staging system for heart failure emphasizes disease development and progression:
- Stage A: At-risk for heart failure (risk factors but no structural heart disease)
- Stage B: Pre-heart failure (structural heart disease but no symptoms)
- Stage C: Heart failure with symptoms and structural heart disease
- Stage D: Advanced heart failure (refractory to standard therapy)
A patient with an EF <28% has significant structural heart disease, and assuming they have symptoms (which is likely with such a low EF), they would be classified as Stage C heart failure 1, 2.
Clinical Implications of EF <28%
An EF <28% indicates severe systolic dysfunction with important clinical implications:
- Mortality risk: Significantly increased risk of mortality compared to patients with higher EF values 3
- Treatment approach: Requires aggressive guideline-directed medical therapy
- Device therapy consideration: Meets criteria for consideration of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (EF <30% with QRS duration ≥120ms) 1
- Advanced therapy evaluation: May need evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy if QRS duration is ≥150ms or between 120-149ms with mechanical dyssynchrony 1
Treatment Considerations
For a patient with HFrEF (EF <28%), guideline-directed medical therapy should include:
- ACE inhibitors or ARBs (if ACE inhibitors not tolerated)
- Evidence-based beta-blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, or nebivolol)
- Aldosterone antagonists
- SGLT2 inhibitors
- Consideration for device therapy (ICD, CRT) based on specific criteria
- Evaluation for potential revascularization if ischemic etiology is present 4
Monitoring Recommendations
With such a low EF, close monitoring is essential:
- Serial echocardiographic assessment of LV function
- Monitoring of natriuretic peptide levels
- Regular clinical assessment for signs of worsening heart failure
- Renal function and electrolyte monitoring, especially with medication adjustments
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Assuming that a single EF measurement is adequate; trajectory over time is important 1
- Delaying consideration of device therapy in eligible patients
- Inadequate medication optimization before concluding medical therapy has failed
- Overlooking potential reversible causes of heart failure
Remember that while an EF <28% indicates severe systolic dysfunction, some patients may show improvement with optimal medical therapy, and the EF should be reassessed periodically to guide ongoing management.