What stage of heart failure is a patient with an ejection fraction (EF) of less than 28% considered to have?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Heart Failure Staging for a Patient with EF <28%

A patient with an ejection fraction (EF) of less than 28% has Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), which is classified as Stage C heart failure according to the most recent ACC/AHA guidelines. 1, 2

Classification of Heart Failure by Ejection Fraction

Heart failure is categorized based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as follows:

  • HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction): LVEF ≤40%
  • HFmrEF (Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction): LVEF 41-49%
  • HFpEF (Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction): LVEF ≥50%

With an EF <28%, this patient clearly falls into the HFrEF category, which is defined as LVEF ≤40% according to the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines 1.

Staging of Heart Failure

The ACC/AHA staging system for heart failure emphasizes disease development and progression:

  1. Stage A: At-risk for heart failure (risk factors but no structural heart disease)
  2. Stage B: Pre-heart failure (structural heart disease but no symptoms)
  3. Stage C: Heart failure with symptoms and structural heart disease
  4. Stage D: Advanced heart failure (refractory to standard therapy)

A patient with an EF <28% has significant structural heart disease, and assuming they have symptoms (which is likely with such a low EF), they would be classified as Stage C heart failure 1, 2.

Clinical Implications of EF <28%

An EF <28% indicates severe systolic dysfunction with important clinical implications:

  • Mortality risk: Significantly increased risk of mortality compared to patients with higher EF values 3
  • Treatment approach: Requires aggressive guideline-directed medical therapy
  • Device therapy consideration: Meets criteria for consideration of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (EF <30% with QRS duration ≥120ms) 1
  • Advanced therapy evaluation: May need evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy if QRS duration is ≥150ms or between 120-149ms with mechanical dyssynchrony 1

Treatment Considerations

For a patient with HFrEF (EF <28%), guideline-directed medical therapy should include:

  • ACE inhibitors or ARBs (if ACE inhibitors not tolerated)
  • Evidence-based beta-blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, or nebivolol)
  • Aldosterone antagonists
  • SGLT2 inhibitors
  • Consideration for device therapy (ICD, CRT) based on specific criteria
  • Evaluation for potential revascularization if ischemic etiology is present 4

Monitoring Recommendations

With such a low EF, close monitoring is essential:

  • Serial echocardiographic assessment of LV function
  • Monitoring of natriuretic peptide levels
  • Regular clinical assessment for signs of worsening heart failure
  • Renal function and electrolyte monitoring, especially with medication adjustments

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Assuming that a single EF measurement is adequate; trajectory over time is important 1
  • Delaying consideration of device therapy in eligible patients
  • Inadequate medication optimization before concluding medical therapy has failed
  • Overlooking potential reversible causes of heart failure

Remember that while an EF <28% indicates severe systolic dysfunction, some patients may show improvement with optimal medical therapy, and the EF should be reassessed periodically to guide ongoing management.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Heart Failure Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Revascularization in severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.