Triphasic and Biphasic Flow in Bilateral Lower Extremities: Clinical Significance
Triphasic flow in the bilateral lower extremities indicates normal arterial circulation, while biphasic flow suggests early arterial disease that may not yet be hemodynamically significant. The presence or absence of these flow patterns provides important diagnostic information about vascular health and potential peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
Understanding Arterial Flow Patterns
Normal Triphasic Flow
- Characterized by three distinct phases in the Doppler waveform:
- Rapid forward flow during systole
- Brief flow reversal in early diastole
- Forward diastolic flow during late diastole
- Indicates normal arterial elasticity and peripheral resistance 1, 2
- Typically seen in healthy individuals with no significant arterial disease 3
Biphasic Flow
- Consists of only two components:
- Forward systolic flow
- Reversed flow in early diastole (with absence of the forward diastolic component)
- Suggests early arterial disease or increased peripheral resistance 2
- May be present in approximately one-third of patients with risk factors even when ankle-brachial index (ABI) is normal 4
Monophasic Flow
- Shows only forward flow throughout the cardiac cycle
- Indicates significant arterial stenosis or occlusion
- Associated with advanced peripheral arterial disease 1
Clinical Significance
Diagnostic Value
- Triphasic waveforms in the posterior tibial artery and dorsalis pedis artery are normal findings in healthy individuals 3
- Progression from triphasic to biphasic to monophasic flow correlates with increasing severity of arterial disease 1
- Biphasic flow may represent an early marker of arterial disease before other clinical manifestations 4
Correlation with Symptoms
- In patients with atherosclerotic disease, the presence of triphasic or good biphasic retrograde collateral flow may prevent ischemia 1
- Monophasic flow or absence of retrograde flow is associated with worse symptoms of claudication 1
- The transition from triphasic to biphasic flow may occur before patients become symptomatic 4
Prognostic Implications
- Flow pattern assessment helps predict the risk of progression to critical limb ischemia
- Patients with biphasic (versus triphasic) flow are more likely to be older, shorter, have diabetes, and demonstrate greater aortic pulse wave velocity 2
- Arteriosclerosis (increased arterial stiffness) decreases both reverse and diastolic forward flows, potentially causing circulatory disturbance in the lower extremities 2
Clinical Application and Assessment
Recommended Evaluation
- Duplex Doppler ultrasound is the first-line noninvasive test for evaluating arterial flow patterns 5
- Assessment should include both waveform analysis and ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement 4
- ABI values ≤0.90 confirm PAD diagnosis, 0.91-0.99 require additional testing, and 1.00-1.40 are considered normal 6
Limitations and Pitfalls
- Relying solely on ABI without waveform analysis may miss early arterial disease 4
- Arterial calcification (especially in diabetic patients) can falsely elevate ABI readings 5
- Evaluation may be limited by poor accessibility of vessels and shadowing from vascular calcifications 5
Additional Considerations
- Bilateral examination is necessary even when symptoms are unilateral to establish baseline flow patterns 5
- Flow patterns should be assessed at multiple levels (aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, and tibial) 5
- Changes in flow patterns over time may indicate disease progression and warrant closer monitoring 6
Management Implications
For patients with abnormal flow patterns:
- Regular surveillance with duplex ultrasound (initial follow-up at 1-3 months) 6
- Risk factor modification (smoking cessation, lipid management, blood pressure control) 6
- Consider further imaging (CTA or MRA) if symptoms progress or flow patterns deteriorate 5
- Early intervention may be warranted to prevent progression to critical limb ischemia 5
Understanding the significance of triphasic and biphasic flow patterns helps clinicians identify patients at risk for peripheral arterial disease before they develop significant symptoms, allowing for earlier intervention and potentially better outcomes.