What is the incidence of malignant hypothermia in the general population?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Incidence of Malignant Hyperthermia in the General Population

The incidence of malignant hyperthermia (MH) in the general population is estimated to range from 1:10,000 to 1:250,000 general anesthetics, with the most recent and reliable UK data suggesting an incidence of approximately 1:100,000 to 1:250,000 anesthetics. 1

Epidemiological Considerations

The reported incidence of MH varies significantly due to several factors that affect accurate estimation:

  • Reporting challenges: Incomplete reporting of suspected reactions
  • Diagnostic confirmation: Failure to confirm diagnosis with definitive testing
  • Denominator accuracy: Inaccurate estimates of total general anesthetics administered
  • Data collection methods: Use of administrative databases with varying reliability 1

Regional Variations

In the United Kingdom:

  • Approximately 20 confirmed new cases of MH occur each year
  • Using Royal College of Anaesthetists' data (3 million general anesthetics annually), the incidence is approximately 1:100,000 1
  • Using international data on anesthetic administration rates (1 anesthetic per 10 population annually), the UK incidence is closer to 1:250,000 1

Demographic Patterns

Important demographic patterns in MH incidence include:

  • Age distribution: Higher incidence in pediatric populations
  • Gender distribution: Consistently higher incidence in males compared to females
  • Genetic prevalence: Genetic variants associated with MH risk have a combined prevalence of less than 1:2000 in the general population, significantly higher than the clinical incidence 1

Trends in Incidence

The number of MH cases has shown some notable trends:

  • Slight decrease in annual cases over time
  • Reduction correlates with decreased use of suxamethonium (a known trigger)
  • Cases during inhalational anesthesia without suxamethonium have remained relatively constant over the past 40 years 1

Discrepancy Between Genetic Prevalence and Clinical Incidence

An important clinical consideration is the significant discrepancy between:

  • Genetic prevalence of MH-associated variants (approximately 1:2000)
  • Clinical incidence of MH reactions (1:10,000 to 1:250,000)

This suggests reduced penetrance of MH susceptibility, with both genetic and non-genetic factors likely contributing to whether a susceptible individual will experience an MH reaction when exposed to triggering agents 1

Mortality Considerations

While not directly related to incidence, it's worth noting that mortality from MH has decreased dramatically:

  • Historical mortality: 70-80% in the 1960s
  • Current mortality: Approximately 4% in the UK with proper treatment 1
  • Early recognition and prompt treatment are critical for reducing mortality 2, 3

Clinical Implications

The relatively low incidence of MH, combined with its potentially fatal consequences, underscores the importance of:

  • Maintaining vigilance during anesthesia administration
  • Recognizing that prior uneventful anesthesia does not rule out MH risk
  • Having dantrolene sodium available wherever general anesthesia is administered
  • Early recognition of signs, particularly elevated end-tidal CO2
  • Prompt discontinuation of triggering agents when MH is suspected 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Malignant hyperthermia: a review.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2015

Research

Malignant hyperthermia.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.