What is the recommended method for documenting range of motion (ROM) in a 91-year-old patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Documenting Range of Motion in a 91-Year-Old Patient

For a 91-year-old patient, range of motion (ROM) should be documented using standardized goniometric measurements with specific attention to pain limitations, functional impact, and comparison to age-appropriate norms rather than standard adult values. 1

Recommended Documentation Method

Measurement Approach

  • Use a universal goniometer for objective measurements
  • Document both active and passive ROM for each joint
  • Record measurements in degrees
  • Note the specific position in which measurements were taken (sitting, supine, etc.)
  • Compare bilateral measurements when appropriate

Essential Components to Document

  1. Quantitative Measurements:

    • Record exact degrees of motion using standardized positions
    • Document starting position (zero position) and end range
    • Note whether measurement is active or passive ROM
  2. Qualitative Assessment:

    • Document quality of movement (smooth, jerky, guarded)
    • Record end-feel characteristics (firm, soft, empty, springy)
    • Note any pain during movement (location, intensity, point in range)
  3. Functional Context:

    • Document how ROM limitations affect specific daily activities
    • Note any compensatory movements used
    • Record use of assistive devices required due to ROM limitations
  4. Pain Assessment:

    • Document if ROM is limited by pain rather than mechanical restriction 1
    • Note if pain occurs throughout range or only at end-range
    • Record if patient demonstrates anticipatory pain avoidance

Special Considerations for Geriatric Patients

Age-Appropriate Expectations

  • ROM naturally decreases with age, but substantial loss should not be attributed solely to aging 2
  • Most joint motions show only 3-5° decrease in the oldest age groups compared to younger adults 2
  • Only hip extension typically shows >20% decline with age 2

Pain vs. Mechanical Limitation

  • Differentiate between true mechanical restrictions (firm end-feel) and pain-limited ROM (softer end-feel with patient resistance) 1
  • Document muscle guarding or protective spasms that may limit motion
  • Note if neuromuscular inhibition appears to be affecting normal movement patterns

Functional Assessment Integration

  • Incorporate mobility assessment tools appropriate for geriatric patients:
    • Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (>12 seconds indicates increased fall risk) 3
    • 4-Stage Balance Test (inability to hold tandem stand for 10 seconds indicates fall risk) 3

Documentation Template Example

Joint: [specific joint]
Position: [patient position during measurement]
Active ROM: [degrees] [note any pain, quality issues]
Passive ROM: [degrees] [note any pain, quality issues]
End-feel: [firm, soft, empty, springy]
Pain: [location, intensity (0-10), point in range]
Functional impact: [specific ADLs affected]
Comparison to previous: [change from baseline if available]

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Misattributing ROM limitations: Don't assume limitations are solely due to age when they may be due to pain, pathology, or disuse 1
  • Overlooking pain as primary limiter: Address pain first when it's the primary limiting factor rather than mechanical restriction 1
  • Neglecting functional context: ROM measurements alone provide incomplete information without functional task assessment 1
  • Using inappropriate norms: Don't compare elderly ROM to standard adult norms; use age-appropriate references 2

By following these guidelines, clinicians can accurately document ROM in elderly patients while providing meaningful context for clinical decision-making and monitoring changes over time.

References

Guideline

Physical Assessment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.