What are the considerations for choosing between anterior-posterior (AP) and anterior-lateral (AL) placement in medical procedures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Anterior-Posterior vs. Anterior-Lateral Placement in Medical Procedures

For cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, anterior-lateral electrode positioning is more effective than anterior-posterior positioning, with higher first-shock success rates (54% vs 33%) and better overall conversion rates (93% vs 85%). 1

Cardioversion Electrode Placement

Efficacy Comparison

  • The most recent high-quality evidence from a 2021 multicenter randomized trial involving 468 patients showed anterior-lateral (AL) electrode positioning was significantly more effective than anterior-posterior (AP) for biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation 1
  • This contradicts earlier guidelines and smaller studies that suggested AP positioning was superior
  • Key findings from the 2021 study:
    • First shock success: 54% with AL vs 33% with AP (22% absolute difference)
    • Overall success after maximum 4 shocks: 93% with AL vs 85% with AP
    • No significant differences in safety outcomes between approaches 1

Technical Considerations

  • For AL placement:

    • Place the anterior pad to the left of the sternum, directly against the chest wall
    • Position pads under rather than over breast tissue to ensure good skin contact 2
    • For large-breasted individuals, position the pad lateral to or underneath the left breast 2
  • For AP placement:

    • Allows current to reach sufficient atrial myocardium when pathology involves both atria (e.g., atrial septal defects, cardiomyopathy)
    • Drawback: Amount of pulmonary tissue between anterior paddle and heart, particularly in patients with emphysema 3

Optimization Techniques

  • Use pads with diameter of 8-12 cm for optimal current flow 3
  • Ensure direct contact with skin (no clothing in between) 2
  • Use electrolyte-impregnated pads to minimize electrical resistance 2
  • Consider removing excessive chest hair if necessary 2
  • Deliver shocks during expiration when possible to optimize current flow 2

Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Approach

For POEM procedures, both anterior (2 o'clock) and posterior (5 o'clock) tunnel orientations show:

  • Comparable efficacy
  • Similar safety profiles
  • Equivalent post-procedure reflux rates 3

The 2024 AGA Clinical Practice Update recommends:

  • Selection between anterior vs posterior POEM should depend primarily on endoscopist's preference and patient characteristics
  • For patients with prior surgery (including LHM or POEM), use an approach opposite in orientation from the site of prior surgery to avoid fibrosis 3

Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty

When comparing direct anterior approach (DAA) versus posterior approach (PA) or lateral approach (LA):

  • DAA shows better early functional outcomes with higher Harris Hip Scores at 6 weeks compared to PA and at 12 weeks compared to LA
  • DAA has shorter length of hospital stay compared to PA
  • No significant differences in risk of complications (dislocations, neurapraxias, periprosthetic fractures, VTE) between approaches 4

Endoscopic Adrenalectomy Approaches

Three main approaches are used:

  • Lateral (transperitoneal)
  • Posterior (retroperitoneal)
  • Anterior (transperitoneal)

Key considerations:

  • Anterior approach requires advanced laparoscopic skills
  • Both transperitoneal approaches (anterior and lateral) are suitable for larger adrenal masses
  • Posterior approach may be better for obese patients or cases with small lesions 5

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Outdated guidelines may still recommend AP positioning for cardioversion based on older studies using monophasic waveforms, but the most recent evidence supports AL positioning with modern biphasic defibrillators 1
  • For patients with implanted cardiac devices, position pads at least 8 cm away from the device 2
  • Body mass index significantly affects operative time in transperitoneal approaches for adrenalectomy 5
  • In POEM procedures, interpretation of data comparing anterior vs posterior approaches is limited by short follow-up and heterogeneity in myotomy length, objective pH testing, and outcome definitions 3

References

Guideline

Defibrillation and Cardioversion Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.