What is the workup for a patient with chest pain concerning for pulmonary embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Workup for Chest Pain Concerning for Pulmonary Embolism

The workup for a patient with chest pain concerning for pulmonary embolism should follow a structured approach beginning with clinical probability assessment, D-dimer testing if indicated, and chest imaging (primarily CT pulmonary angiography) if warranted by clinical probability or D-dimer results. 1

Initial Clinical Assessment

Clinical Probability Assessment

  • Use validated clinical prediction rules to determine pre-test probability:
    • Wells Score or Geneva Score 1, 2
    • Components include:
      • Previous PE or DVT history
      • Heart rate >100 bpm
      • Recent surgery or immobilization
      • Clinical signs of DVT
      • Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE
      • Hemoptysis
      • Active cancer

Very Low Risk Assessment

  • In patients with probability of PE <15%, no further testing is needed if ALL of these 8 characteristics are present 3:
    • Age <50 years
    • Heart rate <100/min
    • Oxygen saturation >94%
    • No recent surgery or trauma
    • No prior venous thromboembolism
    • No hemoptysis
    • No unilateral leg swelling
    • No estrogen use

Laboratory Testing

D-dimer Testing

  • Indicated for patients with low or intermediate clinical probability 1
  • A negative D-dimer (<500 ng/mL) in low/intermediate probability patients can safely exclude PE without further imaging 3
  • Age-adjusted D-dimer threshold (age × 10 ng/mL) can be used for patients ≥50 years 3
  • Not necessary in high probability patients (>40% probability) who should proceed directly to imaging 3
  • Limited value in pregnant, postoperative, and trauma patients 1

Other Laboratory Tests

  • Arterial blood gas analysis (may show hypoxemia and hypocapnia) 1
  • Cardiac biomarkers (troponin, BNP) to assess for RV dysfunction and risk stratification 2
  • Complete blood count, basic metabolic panel, coagulation studies

Imaging Studies

Chest X-ray

  • First-line imaging to exclude alternative diagnoses (pneumonia, pneumothorax, etc.) 1
  • Often abnormal but findings are non-specific for PE 1
  • Required before V/Q scanning to allow accurate interpretation 1

CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)

  • Primary imaging modality for evaluating suspected PE 1
  • High sensitivity and specificity for detecting PE in central and segmental pulmonary arteries 1
  • Can identify alternative diagnoses for chest pain 1

Ventilation/Perfusion (V/Q) Scan

  • Alternative when CTPA is contraindicated (renal insufficiency, contrast allergy) 1
  • A normal perfusion scan effectively excludes PE 1
  • Most useful when chest X-ray is normal 1

Echocardiography

  • Indicated immediately in patients with shock or hypotension 2
  • Evaluates for right ventricular dysfunction and strain 2
  • Findings suggestive of PE:
    • RV dilation and hypokinesis
    • Interventricular septal flattening
    • 60/60 sign (pulmonary acceleration time <60 ms with tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient <60 mmHg) 2

ECG

  • Limited diagnostic value due to low sensitivity and specificity 2
  • May show:
    • S1Q3T3 pattern (sensitivity 11-50%, specificity >90%)
    • T-wave inversions in leads V1-V4
    • Right bundle branch block
    • Sinus tachycardia
    • Non-specific ST-segment and T-wave changes 2

Management Based on Hemodynamic Status

Hemodynamically Stable Patients

  • Transfer to emergency department or chest pain unit 2
  • Begin anticoagulation if PE is confirmed 3

Hemodynamically Unstable Patients

  • Immediate echocardiography 2
  • Consider immediate anticoagulation with IV heparin bolus (80 units/kg) 2
  • Transfer to centers with advanced capabilities (ICU with thrombectomy capabilities) 2
  • Consider thrombolysis if deteriorating or in cardiac arrest 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on clinical presentation (symptoms are non-specific) 1
  • Waiting for all test results before starting anticoagulation in high-risk patients 2
  • Overlooking PE in patients with atypical presentations (syncope, angina-like symptoms) 4
  • Misinterpreting imaging studies due to technical factors or anatomic variants 5
  • Failing to adjust D-dimer thresholds for age in older patients 3

By following this structured approach, clinicians can effectively diagnose or exclude PE while minimizing unnecessary testing and treatment delays that could impact patient outcomes.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Chest Pain Following Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pitfalls in the imaging of pulmonary embolism.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.