What is a femoral-femoral (fem-fem) bypass?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Femoral-Femoral (Fem-Fem) Bypass

A femoral-femoral bypass is a surgical procedure that creates a crossover graft between the femoral arteries of both legs, using one femoral artery with adequate inflow as a donor to supply blood to the contralateral limb with compromised circulation. 1

Anatomical Considerations and Technique

  • The procedure involves:

    • Creating a subcutaneous tunnel across the suprapubic region
    • Placing a synthetic graft (typically polytetrafluoroethylene or polyester) from one femoral artery to the other
    • The donor side must have adequate inflow from the iliac artery
    • The graft is typically externally supported to prevent kinking
  • The procedure is performed when:

    • One iliac artery has significant occlusive disease
    • The contralateral iliac artery has adequate flow
    • The patient is not a suitable candidate for direct aortic reconstruction

Indications

Fem-fem bypass is indicated in the following scenarios:

  1. Bilateral iliac artery occlusive disease when the patient is not a suitable candidate for aortobifemoral bypass 1
  2. Unilateral iliac occlusion in high-risk patients who cannot tolerate aortic surgery 2
  3. Critical limb ischemia requiring urgent revascularization in patients with prohibitive surgical risk for direct aortic approach 2
  4. After endovascular treatment of one iliac artery when the contralateral iliac artery also has occlusive disease 1

Outcomes and Efficacy

  • Patency rates:

    • Primary patency at 3 years: approximately 70-82% 2, 3
    • Secondary patency at 3 years: approximately 89% 2
    • Limb salvage rates at 3 years: 85-89% 2, 4
  • Mortality and morbidity:

    • Operative mortality: 5-6% overall (higher in urgent cases, lower in elective cases) 2, 4
    • Morbidity: approximately 27% 2

Comparison with Other Procedures

Fem-fem bypass is generally considered inferior to aortobifemoral bypass:

  • Aortobifemoral bypass has superior long-term patency (85-87% at 5 years vs. 70% for fem-fem) 1, 4
  • Hemodynamic performance is better with aortobifemoral bypass (higher ankle-brachial index) 4
  • Fem-fem bypass has higher risk of late failure due to progression of disease in the donor iliac artery 5

Factors Affecting Outcomes

Several factors influence the success of fem-fem bypass:

  • Graft material: Externally supported prosthetic grafts show better patency than non-supported grafts or autogenous vein 3
  • Previous vascular procedures: Patency rates are lower when performed after previous vascular graft failures 3
  • Outflow status: Patency is significantly reduced when the superficial femoral artery is occluded 5
  • Donor iliac artery quality: Adequate inflow is essential for long-term success 4

Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls

  • Always assess donor iliac artery adequacy before performing fem-fem bypass to ensure sufficient inflow
  • Consider preoperative angioplasty of donor iliac artery stenosis to improve inflow 3
  • Monitor for disease progression in the donor iliac artery, which can cause late graft failure
  • Use externally supported grafts whenever possible to improve long-term patency 3
  • Consider outflow status when selecting patients; those with superficial femoral artery occlusion may have poorer outcomes 5

Algorithm for Decision-Making

  1. First-line approach for bilateral aortoiliac disease: Aortobifemoral bypass (if patient is an acceptable surgical candidate) 1
  2. Consider fem-fem bypass when:
    • Patient has high surgical risk for direct aortic approach
    • Unilateral iliac disease with adequate contralateral iliac artery
    • After successful endovascular treatment of one iliac artery
  3. Avoid fem-fem bypass when:
    • Both iliac arteries have significant disease
    • Patient is a good candidate for aortobifemoral bypass
    • Donor iliac artery has significant stenosis that cannot be treated

In summary, while fem-fem bypass is not the first-line treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease, it remains an important option for selected patients who cannot undergo direct aortic reconstruction, with acceptable patency rates and limb salvage outcomes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.