What is the release date of QOL (Quality of Life) Bronchiectasis version 3.1?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

QOL-Bronchiectasis Version 3.1 Release Date

The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) version 3.1 was released in 2014.

Background on QOL-B Development

The QOL-B is the first disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed for patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Its development followed a rigorous process:

  1. Initial Development:

    • Content was derived from literature reviews, existing measures, and physician input
    • Preliminary cognitive testing with 35 bronchiectasis patients generated version 1.0
    • Open-ended patient interviews (n=28) led to version 2.0
  2. Version 3.0 Development:

    • Psychometric analyses using data from an open-label phase 2 trial with 89 patients
    • Resulted in a 37-item questionnaire with 8 scales:
      • Respiratory symptoms
      • Physical functioning
      • Role functioning
      • Emotional functioning
      • Social functioning
      • Vitality
      • Health perceptions
      • Treatment burden
  3. Final Version 3.1:

    • Created after a final cognitive testing study (n=40)
    • Involved a minor change to one social functioning scale item 1
    • This is the version that was released in 2014

Clinical Importance of QOL-B

The QOL-B has become an important tool in bronchiectasis management for several reasons:

  • Validated Measurement: The QOL-B demonstrates excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥0.70) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.72) 2

  • Exacerbation Prediction: Recent research shows that the QOL-B Respiratory Symptom Scale (QOL-B-RSS) can predict future exacerbation risk in adults with bronchiectasis 3

  • Treatment Response Assessment: The minimal important difference for the Respiratory Symptoms scale has been established at 8.0 points, allowing clinicians to assess meaningful clinical changes 2

Implementation in Guidelines

The importance of quality of life assessment in bronchiectasis is recognized in major clinical guidelines:

  • The British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend considering routine monitoring of quality of life when planning interventions 4

  • The European Respiratory Society guidelines recognize the importance of quality of life assessment in bronchiectasis management 5

Clinical Application

When using the QOL-B in practice:

  • Scores for each scale are standardized on a 0-100 point scale
  • Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life
  • No total score is calculated
  • The QOL-B can detect clinically meaningful changes in respiratory symptoms during exacerbations (mean decrease of approximately 14 points) 2

Relationship to Disease Factors

Quality of life in bronchiectasis patients is related to:

  • Disease etiology: Patients with COPD-related bronchiectasis show significantly lower QOL compared to other etiologies 6

  • Disease severity: Increasing severity as measured by validated tools (FACED, E-FACED, Bronchiectasis Severity Index) correlates with lower QOL 6

The QOL-B version 3.1 remains the current standard for assessing quality of life in bronchiectasis patients and is valuable for both clinical practice and research purposes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.