Treatment of Enterobacter cloacae Complex Infections
For Enterobacter cloacae complex infections, carbapenems are the first-line treatment option, with ceftazidime-avibactam as an alternative for carbapenem-resistant strains. 1
Source of Infection
Enterobacter cloacae complex is commonly found in:
Healthcare-associated settings:
- Urinary tract infections (particularly catheter-associated)
- Intra-abdominal infections
- Surgical site infections
- Pneumonia (especially ventilator-associated)
- Bloodstream infections
Community settings (less common):
- Gastrointestinal tract (natural reservoir)
- Soil and water environments
Antibiotic Treatment Algorithm
First-line Treatment:
- Carbapenems: Meropenem (1g IV every 8 hours) or Imipenem/cilastatin (1g IV every 8 hours) 1, 2
- For severe infections, consider high-dose extended-infusion meropenem (2g IV q8h as 3-hour infusion) 2
For Carbapenem-Resistant E. cloacae:
KPC-producing strains:
OXA-48-producing strains:
- Ceftazidime-avibactam (2.5g IV every 8 hours) 1
MBL-producing strains:
For Specific Infection Sites:
- Complicated intra-abdominal infections: Add metronidazole (500mg IV every 8 hours) to any of the above regimens 1, 3
- Urinary tract infections: Carbapenems or ceftazidime-avibactam as monotherapy 1, 3
- Pneumonia: Consider meropenem-vaborbactam due to better pulmonary penetration 1
Treatment Duration
- Bloodstream infections: 10-14 days 2
- Complicated UTI: 7-14 days 2, 3
- Intra-abdominal infections: 5-14 days 2, 3
- Pneumonia: 7-14 days 2
Clinical Evidence and Rationale
Carbapenems are strongly recommended as first-line therapy for E. cloacae complex infections due to the high prevalence of AmpC β-lactamases and potential for ESBL production in these organisms. Studies have shown significantly better outcomes with carbapenem therapy compared to non-carbapenem alternatives:
- A study of ESBL-producing E. cloacae bloodstream infections showed that patients treated with carbapenems had lower sepsis-related mortality (9.4% vs 29.5%) compared to those treated with non-carbapenem β-lactams 4
- Another study demonstrated that clinical failure at 96 hours was significantly lower in patients receiving carbapenems (25%) compared to non-carbapenem antibiotics (77.8%) 5
Traditional third-generation cephalosporins should be avoided due to the high risk of treatment failure, even if initially reported as susceptible, due to inducible AmpC β-lactamases 6.
For carbapenem-resistant strains, ceftazidime-avibactam has shown promising results, particularly for KPC and OXA-48-producing strains 1. The FDA has specifically approved ceftazidime-avibactam for infections caused by E. cloacae in complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated UTIs, and hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia 3.
Important Considerations and Pitfalls
Avoid third-generation cephalosporins: E. cloacae can rapidly develop resistance during treatment with third-generation cephalosporins due to inducible AmpC β-lactamases 6
Consider local resistance patterns: Treatment should be guided by local susceptibility data and individual patient risk factors for resistant organisms 2
Antimicrobial stewardship: Reserve newer agents like ceftazidime-avibactam for confirmed resistant infections to prevent further resistance development 2
Source control: Surgical drainage of abscesses, removal of infected devices, and other source control measures are essential components of treatment 1
Monitoring for resistance: For patients on prolonged therapy, consider repeat cultures to monitor for development of resistance 2
By following this evidence-based approach to the treatment of E. cloacae complex infections, clinicians can optimize outcomes while practicing appropriate antimicrobial stewardship.