Can tranexamic acid (TXA) stop an upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Tranexamic Acid for Upper GI Bleeding

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is not recommended as a routine treatment for upper GI bleeding as it does not reduce rebleeding rates, and evidence for its mortality benefit is inconsistent and of low quality. 1

Current Evidence on TXA for Upper GI Bleeding

Guideline Recommendations

The most recent guidelines on gastrointestinal bleeding indicate that:

  • Tranexamic acid has shown some evidence of reducing mortality and surgical intervention in older meta-analyses, but these benefits disappear when analysis is limited to trials with low risk of bias 1
  • The evidence supporting TXA use is considered historic and predates routine use of high-dose acid suppression and modern endoscopic therapy 1
  • Current guidelines suggest that TXA use should be confined to clinical trials rather than routine clinical practice 1

First-Line Treatments for Upper GI Bleeding

Instead of TXA, the following treatments are recommended:

  1. Endoscopic therapy: The cornerstone of management for high-risk stigmata (active bleeding or visible vessel) 1

    • Combination therapy with epinephrine injection plus another method (thermocoagulation or clips) is superior to epinephrine alone 1
  2. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs):

    • High-dose PPI therapy (80 mg stat followed by 8 mg/hour infusion for 72 hours) is strongly recommended following successful endoscopic therapy 1
    • This approach reduces rebleeding rates, blood transfusion requirements, and hospital stay 1

Potential Role of TXA in Specific Situations

While not recommended as routine therapy, TXA might be considered in specific circumstances:

  • When conventional endoscopic therapies are not available or have failed 1
  • In patients awaiting definitive treatment (as a temporizing measure) 2
  • In dialysis patients with major upper GI bleeding, where a small non-randomized study showed benefits in reducing rebleeding and transfusion requirements 3

Safety Considerations

  • Thromboembolic risk: Available data from older trials suggest TXA does not significantly increase thromboembolic disease risk 4
  • Studies have been too small to adequately assess thromboembolic events in GI bleeding 1

Management Algorithm for Upper GI Bleeding

  1. Initial resuscitation and risk assessment

    • Fluid resuscitation
    • Blood transfusion if hemoglobin <70-90 g/L
  2. First-line treatment:

    • Early endoscopy (within 24 hours)
    • Endoscopic therapy for high-risk stigmata
    • High-dose PPI therapy following endoscopy
  3. For refractory bleeding:

    • Repeat endoscopic therapy (one attempt)
    • Consider interventional radiology or surgery if bleeding persists
  4. Consider TXA only if:

    • Participating in a clinical trial
    • Conventional therapies have failed or are unavailable
    • As a temporizing measure while awaiting definitive treatment

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Relying on TXA alone without pursuing definitive endoscopic therapy may delay appropriate treatment
  • The HALT-IT trial results (pending at the time of these guidelines) were expected to provide more definitive evidence on TXA in GI bleeding 5
  • Most evidence for TXA comes from studies conducted before modern endoscopic techniques and PPI therapy were widely available 1

In summary, while some evidence suggests TXA may reduce mortality in upper GI bleeding, current guidelines do not support its routine use outside clinical trials. Endoscopic therapy combined with high-dose PPI remains the standard of care.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.