Guidelines for Interpreting an MRI Reading
MRI interpretation requires a structured approach with standardized reporting to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective communication between radiologists and referring clinicians.
MRI Report Structure
A comprehensive MRI report should include the following key components 1:
1. MRI Technique
- Brief description of anatomical area covered (brain, spinal cord, optic nerve, etc.)
- Field strength used (minimum 1.5T recommended) 1
- Slice thickness (3mm with no gap between slices is optimal) 1
- Type and dose of contrast agent if used
- Sequences performed (T1, T2, FLAIR, DWI, etc.)
2. Findings
The findings section should include 1:
- Systematic description of all imaging findings using standardized terminology
- Lesion characteristics:
- Number and topography
- Size and shape
- Signal characteristics across different sequences
- Enhancement patterns if contrast was used
- Qualitative assessment of lesion load
- Brain atrophy assessment (if applicable)
3. Conclusion
The conclusion should 1:
- Provide a clear radiological interpretation related to the clinical problem
- Identify typical or atypical findings
- Offer differential diagnosis when appropriate
- Indicate evidence of disease activity or progression (in follow-up scans)
- Note any incidental or unexpected findings, classified as clinically relevant or irrelevant
Specific Guidelines by Anatomical Region
Brain MRI
- T2-FLAIR is optimal for lesion detection in the brain 1
- Confirm lesions on multiple planes to avoid artifacts 1
- For multiple sclerosis evaluation, look for lesions in characteristic regions (periventricular, juxtacortical, infratentorial) 1
- White matter lesions should be carefully evaluated, especially in patients >50 years or with vascular risk factors 1
Spinal Cord MRI
- T2-weighted sequences are preferred over T2-FLAIR for spinal cord imaging 1
- Sagittal STIR can improve contrast-to-noise ratio but is susceptible to flow-related artifacts 1
- Additional axial T2-weighted images should be performed to verify changes seen in the sagittal plane 1
Oncological MRI
For cancer screening or evaluation, the ONCO-RADS system provides a structured approach 1:
- Categorize findings from 1-5 based on likelihood of malignancy
- ONCO-RADS 1: Normal finding
- ONCO-RADS 2: Benign finding highly likely
- ONCO-RADS 3: Benign finding likely
- ONCO-RADS 4: Malignant finding likely
- ONCO-RADS 5: Malignant finding highly likely
Competency Requirements
Proper MRI interpretation requires 2:
- Understanding of MRI physics and scanning principles
- Knowledge of contrast enhancement techniques
- Familiarity with multiple pulse sequences (T1, T2, STIR, DWI)
- Recognition of normal anatomy, variants, and pathological conditions
- Ability to identify false-positive and false-negative findings
Follow-up MRI Guidelines
For monitoring disease progression (e.g., in multiple sclerosis) 1:
- Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted scans to reveal inflammation and new/enlarging lesions
- MRI subtraction techniques to facilitate detection of new lesions across serial scans
- Follow-up scans at least annually, or more frequently (every 3-4 months) for patients requiring enhanced pharmacovigilance
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Inadequate technique: Ensure appropriate sequences for the clinical question are performed 1
- Misinterpretation of artifacts: Confirm findings on multiple sequences and planes 1
- Incomplete evaluation: Systematically review all anatomical regions included in the scan 1
- Inconsistent terminology: Use standardized terminology for clear communication 1
- Failure to correlate with clinical information: Always interpret findings in the clinical context 1
Structured Reporting Recommendations
Structured reporting improves communication and clinical decision-making 1:
- Present information in a standardized format
- Include relevant clinical data
- Use clear, consistent terminology
- Integrate technical parameters
- Provide definitive conclusions with appropriate recommendations for follow-up
By following these guidelines, radiologists and clinicians can ensure accurate interpretation of MRI studies, leading to improved patient care and outcomes.