What is the prognosis and treatment for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognosis and Treatment

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) has an excellent prognosis with overall survival rates that often cannot be reached in long-term studies, with 88% of patients still alive at 80 months follow-up. 1

Prognostic Factors

LGESS demonstrates a significantly more favorable prognosis compared to other uterine sarcomas:

  • Histopathology: LGESS is characterized by small cells with low-grade cytology resembling proliferative endometrial stroma with low mitotic activity (usually <5 mitotic figures per 10 HPF) 1
  • Disease presentation: LGESS patients are significantly more likely to present with uterine/cervix-confined disease (68% vs 39% in high-grade ESS) 1
  • Survival rates:
    • Median overall survival for LGESS is not reached in most studies, compared to 53 months for high-grade ESS and 16.5-21 months for other uterine sarcomas 1
    • Five-year survival rate is approximately 93% 2

Favorable prognostic indicators:

  • Absence of myometrial invasion 2
  • Low mitotic count (≤5/HPF) 2
  • Disease limited to the uterus 3

Treatment Approach

Surgical Management

  1. Primary treatment: Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO) is the standard surgical approach 1

    • Routine lymphadenectomy is not indicated as lymph node involvement is less than 5% 1
    • Retention of ovaries may be considered in pre-menopausal women, though bilateral oophorectomy is generally indicated 1
  2. For recurrent disease:

    • Surgical cytoreduction should be considered even in cases with extensive disease 4
    • Complete cytoreduction is associated with improved outcomes 4

Hormonal Therapy

For recurrent or metastatic disease:

  • First-line: Estrogen deprivation therapy with aromatase inhibitors or progestogens 1
  • Contraindicated: Tamoxifen (not recommended due to potential pro-estrogenic effects) 1
  • Post-operative considerations: Hormone replacement therapy is contraindicated 1

Adjuvant Therapy

  • Radiotherapy: Not routinely indicated in FIGO stage I and II disease as it has not been shown to improve survival 1
  • Hormonal therapy: No routine role for adjuvant hormonal treatment due to lack of supporting evidence 1
  • Chemotherapy: Reserved for cases where hormonal therapy fails 1

Recurrence Patterns

  • Recurrence risk is significant, ranging from 1 in 3 to 1 in 2 patients 4
  • Recurrences often occur late, even beyond 5 years after initial treatment 5
  • Local pelvic recurrence is the most common pattern 3
  • Median time to recurrence is approximately 36 months (range 4-108 months) 3

Surveillance Recommendations

Long-term surveillance is crucial due to the tendency for late recurrence:

  • Regular follow-up examinations for at least 5-10 years
  • Consider extended hormonal therapy beyond 5 years to prevent late recurrence 5

Special Considerations

  • Vascular invasion: LGESS can invade blood vessels, occasionally presenting with intravascular extension 4
  • Fertility preservation: Has been described in selected cases but carries risk of recurrence 5
  • Molecular features: Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A may be associated with poor prognosis and resistance to hormonal therapy 6

Treatment Algorithm for Recurrent Disease

  1. First-line: Estrogen deprivation therapy (aromatase inhibitors or progestogens)
  2. If hormone therapy fails: Consider chemotherapy (doxorubicin-based regimens)
  3. For isolated or resectable recurrences: Surgical cytoreduction
  4. For selected cases: Consider targeted therapies like pazopanib after failure of standard approaches

Given the indolent nature of LGESS, the excellent long-term prognosis, and the potential for late recurrence, lifelong surveillance and consideration of extended hormonal therapy are warranted.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.