What is the indication for a lidocaine (anti-arrhythmic medication) drip in a code blue (cardiac arrest) situation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lidocaine Drip in Code Blue: Indications and Administration

Lidocaine drip is indicated in a code blue situation for ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) that is unresponsive to defibrillation attempts, particularly in witnessed cardiac arrests where time to drug administration is shorter. 1

Primary Indications

  • Shock-refractory VF/pVT: Lidocaine is recommended for persistent ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia that has not responded to:

    • CPR
    • Initial defibrillation attempts
    • Vasopressor therapy (epinephrine)
  • Post-bolus maintenance: After initial bolus administration, a lidocaine drip is used to maintain therapeutic levels and prevent recurrence of arrhythmias

Dosing Protocol

  1. Initial bolus:

    • 1.0-1.5 mg/kg IV/IO 1
    • Typically 75-100 mg for average adult 1
  2. Additional boluses if needed:

    • 0.5-0.75 mg/kg IV/IO (25-50 mg) every 5-10 minutes 1
    • Maximum total bolus dose: 3 mg/kg 1
  3. Maintenance infusion:

    • Follow boluses with continuous infusion to maintain therapeutic levels
    • Adjust dosing in patients with heart failure or hepatic dysfunction due to altered metabolism 1

Clinical Evidence and Considerations

The 2018 American Heart Association guidelines place lidocaine alongside amiodarone as a treatment option for shock-refractory VF/pVT 1. This represents an update from earlier guidelines where lidocaine was considered secondary to amiodarone.

Key evidence supporting lidocaine use:

  • Improved rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the ROC-ALPS trial 1
  • Improved survival to hospital admission compared to placebo 1
  • Particularly beneficial in witnessed cardiac arrests 1, 2

Important Caveats

  1. Efficacy limitations: Neither lidocaine nor amiodarone has definitively demonstrated improved long-term survival or neurological outcomes 1, 2

  2. Timing considerations: Do not delay defibrillation or CPR to administer antiarrhythmic medications 3

  3. Potential adverse effects:

    • CNS toxicity at high doses
    • Myocardial depression, especially in patients with shock 4
    • May increase the propensity for asystole during cardiac arrest 4
    • Can potentially reduce defibrillation efficacy by increasing energy requirements 4
  4. Special populations: Dosage adjustment needed in patients with heart failure as volume of distribution and clearance are reduced 1

Alternative Considerations

For specific arrhythmias like torsades de pointes (polymorphic VT with long QT interval), magnesium sulfate (1-2g IV/IO) should be considered instead of lidocaine 1, 3

Summary

Lidocaine drip in code blue is primarily indicated for shock-refractory VF/pVT after failed defibrillation attempts. While it may improve short-term outcomes like ROSC and survival to hospital admission, its impact on long-term survival remains limited. The decision to use lidocaine should be made quickly within the ACLS algorithm, with proper attention to dosing and potential adverse effects.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

The New England journal of medicine, 2016

Guideline

Ventricular Fibrillation Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.