Management of Stable VT/Broad Complex SVT in Patients with ICD Discharges
For patients with stable ventricular tachycardia (VT) or broad complex SVT who have experienced multiple ICD discharges, synchronized cardioversion with appropriate sedation is the recommended first-line treatment. 1
Initial Assessment and Diagnosis
- Always presume wide-QRS tachycardia to be VT if diagnosis is unclear (Class I, Level of Evidence: C) 1
- Differentiate between monomorphic VT (regular form and rate) and polymorphic VT (continually changing QRS morphology)
- Assess hemodynamic stability (blood pressure, level of consciousness, signs of shock)
Treatment Algorithm for Stable VT/Broad Complex SVT
First-Line Approach
- Direct current synchronized cardioversion with appropriate sedation (Class I recommendation) 1
Second-Line Approach (if cardioversion is delayed or deferred)
- Intravenous procainamide is reasonable for initial treatment of stable sustained monomorphic VT (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: B) 1
- More appropriate than amiodarone when early slowing and termination of monomorphic VT is desired 1
- Requires close monitoring of blood pressure and cardiovascular status
Third-Line Options
- Intravenous amiodarone for sustained monomorphic VT that is refractory to cardioversion or recurrent despite procainamide (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: C) 1
- Transvenous catheter pace termination for sustained monomorphic VT that is refractory to cardioversion or frequently recurrent despite medication (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: C) 1
Special Considerations
- Intravenous lidocaine might be reasonable only if VT is specifically associated with acute myocardial ischemia (Class IIb, Level of Evidence: C) 1
- Avoid calcium channel blockers such as verapamil and diltiazem for wide-QRS-complex tachycardia of unknown origin (Class III, Level of Evidence: C) 1
Management of SVT Components (if diagnosis confirmed)
- Vagal maneuvers are recommended as first-line for SVT (Class I, Level of Evidence: B-R) 1, 2
- Adenosine (6 mg rapid IV push, followed by 12 mg if ineffective) is recommended for SVT (Class I, Level of Evidence: B-R) 1, 2
Preventing Recurrent Episodes and ICD Shocks
- Consider electrophysiology study with ablation for recurrent VT episodes causing ICD shocks 3
- For patients with recurrent VT despite first-line antiarrhythmic therapy, catheter ablation resulted in 28% relative risk reduction in death, VT storm, and appropriate ICD shock compared to escalating antiarrhythmic therapy 3
- If VT occurs despite amiodarone therapy, catheter ablation is superior to more aggressive antiarrhythmic drug therapy 3
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Misdiagnosis of SVT as VT based on ICD electrograms alone can lead to inappropriate treatment 4
- Complete electrophysiological study with analysis of electrograms during induced arrhythmias should be considered before discharge in patients with multiple ICD shocks 4
- Multiple ICD shocks can have deleterious mechanical and psychological effects 3
- Ensure optimal ICD programming to minimize unnecessary shocks
By following this algorithm, clinicians can effectively manage patients with stable VT/broad complex SVT who have experienced multiple ICD discharges while minimizing morbidity and mortality.