Comparison of Urokinase vs Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Fibrin-specific agents such as tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) are preferred over both urokinase and streptokinase for the management of acute myocardial infarction due to their superior efficacy and safety profiles. 1
Efficacy Comparison
When directly comparing urokinase and streptokinase:
Patency rates: Urokinase shows higher early patency rates (71.8% vs 48.0% at 60 minutes) compared to streptokinase, though this difference narrows by 90 minutes (71.2% vs 63.9%) 2
Thrombolytic efficacy: When used intracoronary, both agents demonstrate similar efficacy in opening occluded arteries (60% for urokinase vs 57% for streptokinase) 3
Mortality benefit: Both agents provide mortality reduction, with streptokinase showing approximately 22% reduction in the odds of death in early trials 4
Safety Profile Comparison
Systemic fibrinolysis: Urokinase causes less systemic fibrinolysis than streptokinase, with significantly fewer patients experiencing severe fibrinogen depletion 3
Bleeding complications: Urokinase is associated with fewer bleeding complications compared to streptokinase (11% vs 29%) 3, 2
Hypotension: Streptokinase administration may be associated with hypotension, though severe allergic reactions are rare 1
Reuse limitations: Streptokinase should not be re-administered since antibodies persist for at least 10 years, which can impair its activity and increase risk of allergic reactions 1
Current Guidelines Recommendation
Current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (2018) recommend:
Fibrin-specific agents should be preferred over non-fibrin specific agents like streptokinase 1
Single-bolus weight-adjusted tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) is equivalent to accelerated t-PA in reducing 30-day mortality but is safer in preventing non-cerebral bleeds and easier to use in pre-hospital settings 1
Neither urokinase nor streptokinase is currently recommended as first-line therapy for acute MI when fibrin-specific agents are available 1
Important Considerations
Time to treatment: Early administration of thrombolytic therapy is crucial, with greater mortality reduction when treatment is given within the first 2 hours (44% vs 20% for those treated later) 1
Adjunctive therapy: All thrombolytic regimens should include:
- Aspirin (150-325 mg initial dose, chewed)
- Clopidogrel (added to aspirin for patients receiving fibrinolysis)
- Appropriate anticoagulation 1
Contraindications: Both agents share similar contraindications including recent hemorrhagic stroke, known intracranial neoplasm, active internal bleeding, and suspected aortic dissection 1
Practical Algorithm for Thrombolytic Selection
First choice: Fibrin-specific agents (t-PA, TNK-tPA) when available
If fibrin-specific agents unavailable:
Streptokinase may be considered when:
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Do not re-administer streptokinase due to antibody formation and risk of allergic reactions 1
- Monitor for hypotension with streptokinase; temporarily halt infusion if it occurs 1
- Both agents are now largely superseded by fibrin-specific agents in modern practice 1
- The optimal time window for thrombolytic therapy is within 12 hours of symptom onset, with greatest benefit in the first 2 hours 1