What is the best choice between urokinase and streptokinase (thrombolytic agents) in the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Comparison of Urokinase vs Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Fibrin-specific agents such as tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) are preferred over both urokinase and streptokinase for the management of acute myocardial infarction due to their superior efficacy and safety profiles. 1

Efficacy Comparison

When directly comparing urokinase and streptokinase:

  • Patency rates: Urokinase shows higher early patency rates (71.8% vs 48.0% at 60 minutes) compared to streptokinase, though this difference narrows by 90 minutes (71.2% vs 63.9%) 2

  • Thrombolytic efficacy: When used intracoronary, both agents demonstrate similar efficacy in opening occluded arteries (60% for urokinase vs 57% for streptokinase) 3

  • Mortality benefit: Both agents provide mortality reduction, with streptokinase showing approximately 22% reduction in the odds of death in early trials 4

Safety Profile Comparison

  • Systemic fibrinolysis: Urokinase causes less systemic fibrinolysis than streptokinase, with significantly fewer patients experiencing severe fibrinogen depletion 3

  • Bleeding complications: Urokinase is associated with fewer bleeding complications compared to streptokinase (11% vs 29%) 3, 2

  • Hypotension: Streptokinase administration may be associated with hypotension, though severe allergic reactions are rare 1

  • Reuse limitations: Streptokinase should not be re-administered since antibodies persist for at least 10 years, which can impair its activity and increase risk of allergic reactions 1

Current Guidelines Recommendation

Current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (2018) recommend:

  1. Fibrin-specific agents should be preferred over non-fibrin specific agents like streptokinase 1

  2. Single-bolus weight-adjusted tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) is equivalent to accelerated t-PA in reducing 30-day mortality but is safer in preventing non-cerebral bleeds and easier to use in pre-hospital settings 1

  3. Neither urokinase nor streptokinase is currently recommended as first-line therapy for acute MI when fibrin-specific agents are available 1

Important Considerations

  • Time to treatment: Early administration of thrombolytic therapy is crucial, with greater mortality reduction when treatment is given within the first 2 hours (44% vs 20% for those treated later) 1

  • Adjunctive therapy: All thrombolytic regimens should include:

    • Aspirin (150-325 mg initial dose, chewed)
    • Clopidogrel (added to aspirin for patients receiving fibrinolysis)
    • Appropriate anticoagulation 1
  • Contraindications: Both agents share similar contraindications including recent hemorrhagic stroke, known intracranial neoplasm, active internal bleeding, and suspected aortic dissection 1

Practical Algorithm for Thrombolytic Selection

  1. First choice: Fibrin-specific agents (t-PA, TNK-tPA) when available

    • Better mortality outcomes with accelerated t-PA (10 fewer deaths per 1000 patients compared to streptokinase) 1
    • Single-bolus TNK-tPA offers equivalent mortality benefit with fewer non-cerebral bleeds 1
  2. If fibrin-specific agents unavailable:

    • Urokinase may be preferred over streptokinase when:
      • Early coronary bypass surgery is anticipated (less perioperative bleeding) 3
      • Patient has previously received streptokinase (antibody formation) 1
      • Higher risk of bleeding complications exists
  3. Streptokinase may be considered when:

    • Cost is a significant factor 5
    • No previous exposure to streptokinase
    • Lower risk of stroke is prioritized (t-PA has slightly higher stroke risk) 1

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Do not re-administer streptokinase due to antibody formation and risk of allergic reactions 1
  • Monitor for hypotension with streptokinase; temporarily halt infusion if it occurs 1
  • Both agents are now largely superseded by fibrin-specific agents in modern practice 1
  • The optimal time window for thrombolytic therapy is within 12 hours of symptom onset, with greatest benefit in the first 2 hours 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.