What is the difference between discogenic and radiculopathy pain in patients with lumbar spine conditions and what molecular bio markers, such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), can help detect them?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differences Between Discogenic and Radicular Pain in Lumbar Spine Conditions and Molecular Biomarkers

Discogenic pain and radicular pain represent distinct pain mechanisms in lumbar spine conditions, with different clinical presentations, pathophysiological processes, and potential biomarkers for detection.

Key Differences Between Discogenic and Radicular Pain

Discogenic Pain

  • Definition: Pain originating from the intervertebral disc itself
  • Clinical Presentation:
    • Axial midline low back pain
    • May include non-radicular referred leg pain in a sclerotomal distribution
    • Pain typically worsens with sitting, forward bending, and lifting 1
    • No objective neurological deficits

Radicular Pain

  • Definition: Pain caused by irritation of the sensory root or dorsal root ganglion of a spinal nerve
  • Clinical Presentation:
    • Sharp, shooting, or lancinating pain
    • Typically felt as a narrow band of pain down the length of the leg
    • May be associated with radiculopathy (objective sensory and/or motor dysfunction)
    • Often follows specific dermatomal patterns 2

Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Discogenic Pain

  • Internal disc disruption is the leading cause
  • Associated with altered disc morphology visible on CT and MRI
  • Related to internal biophysical features of the disc 3
  • Lacks specific ICD-10-CM diagnostic code, unlike other sources of back pain 1

Radicular Pain

  • Combination of:
    • Compression sensitizing the nerve root to mechanical stimulation
    • Nerve stretching
    • Chemically mediated non-cellular inflammatory reaction 2
  • Not solely due to mass effect from disc herniation

Diagnostic Approaches

Imaging

  • MRI is recommended as the neuroimaging study of choice for evaluation of patients with low back pain 4
  • MRI has high accuracy (99%) in predicting abnormal morphological findings on discography 4
  • MRI without IV contrast is most useful for evaluating suspected cauda equina syndrome, multifocal deficit, or progressive neurologic deficit 4

Discography

  • Controversial diagnostic tool for discogenic pain
  • May identify abnormalities in patients with normal MRI findings, but clinical significance is unclear 4
  • Positive predictive value of an abnormal MRI for a morphologically abnormal discogram is 92% 4
  • Negative predictive value of a normal MRI is 88% 4

Molecular Biomarkers

Inflammatory Markers for Radicular Pain

  • Interleukin-6 (IL-6):
    • Plays a crucial role in radicular pain caused by lumbar spinal stenosis
    • Epidural administration of anti-IL-6 receptor antibody (tocilizumab) has shown effectiveness in reducing radicular leg pain, numbness, and low back pain 5

TNF-α and Other Cytokines

  • Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, IFN-γ) have been investigated in blood and disc samples
  • However, a recent exploratory study found no significant correlation between pain intensity and disc/blood cytokine levels in patients with painful lumbar radiculopathy 6

Factors Influencing Pain Intensity

Recent research suggests that in patients with painful lumbar radiculopathy:

  • Pain catastrophizing, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and gender contribute more to pain intensity than objective measures of inflammation or imaging findings 6
  • The role of mechanical compression and inflammation in determining pain intensity remains unclear 6

Clinical Implications

  • MRI is the preferred initial imaging modality for evaluating both discogenic and radicular pain 4
  • Discography may occasionally provide additional information but is invasive and controversial 4
  • For radicular pain, more than 50% of cases settle with simple analgesics 2
  • Significant and lasting radicular pain relief can be achieved with transforaminal epidural steroid injection 2
  • Surgery is indicated for patients with progressive neurological deficits or severe radicular pain refractory to conservative measures 2

Biomarker Research Limitations

  • Despite investigation of various inflammatory markers, no single biomarker has been established as a reliable diagnostic tool to differentiate between discogenic and radicular pain
  • Pain intensity in lumbar radiculopathy appears to correlate more with psychosocial factors and pain processing mechanisms than with inflammatory markers or disc herniation size 6

The distinction between discogenic and radicular pain is important for proper diagnosis and treatment planning, but current biomarker research has not yet yielded definitive molecular tools for differentiation in clinical practice.

References

Research

Lumbar radicular pain.

Australian family physician, 2004

Research

Lumbar discogenic pain: state-of-the-art review.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2013

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Efficacy of epidural administration of anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody onto spinal nerve for treatment of sciatica.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012

Research

Mechanism underlying painful radiculopathy in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

European journal of pain (London, England), 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.