Best Next Step in Quality Improvement Process for Low Influenza Vaccination Rate
Creating a flow chart of the current process is the best next step in quality improvement for a clinic with less than 10% of eligible patients receiving influenza vaccine.
Understanding the Problem
When facing a significantly low influenza vaccination rate (less than 10%) in a clinic setting, it's essential to first understand the current workflow before implementing interventions. This systematic approach allows for identification of specific barriers and bottlenecks in the vaccination process.
Why Flow Chart First?
Process Mapping Benefits:
- Provides visual representation of the current vaccination workflow
- Identifies gaps, bottlenecks, and missed opportunities in the current process
- Establishes a baseline understanding before implementing changes
- Helps engage staff by creating shared understanding of the current state
Sequence of Quality Improvement Steps:
- Flow chart (current process) → Root cause analysis → Interventions → Measurement
Evidence-Based Approach
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends a structured approach to improving vaccination rates that begins with understanding current processes 1. Successful vaccination programs require systematic assessment before implementation of multifaceted interventions.
Why Not Other Options?
- Patient Survey: While valuable for understanding patient perspectives, this should follow process mapping as barriers may be system-based rather than patient preference-based 1
- Fishbone Diagram: This is part of root cause analysis, which should be performed after understanding the current process flow 1
- Root Cause Analysis: This is a critical step but should follow process mapping to ensure all potential failure points are considered 1
Implementation Steps for Flow Chart Creation
Map the entire vaccination process:
- Patient identification/eligibility determination
- Vaccination offering/recommendation
- Documentation of acceptance/refusal
- Vaccine administration
- Follow-up procedures
Identify key personnel involved in each step:
- Front desk staff
- Medical assistants/nurses
- Providers
- Pharmacy personnel (if applicable)
Document decision points and handoffs:
- When and how vaccination status is assessed
- Who offers the vaccine
- How refusals are handled
- Documentation procedures
Common Barriers to Identify in Flow Chart
Based on ACIP guidelines, look for these common barriers in your process map 1:
System barriers:
- Lack of standing orders
- Unclear responsibility for offering vaccine
- Administrative barriers (costs, accessibility)
- Inadequate documentation systems
Provider barriers:
- Missed opportunities during visits
- Lack of provider recommendation
- Insufficient time during visits
Patient barriers:
- Fear of side effects
- Misconceptions about vaccine effectiveness
- Access issues (time, convenience)
Next Steps After Flow Chart Creation
After creating the flow chart:
- Conduct root cause analysis using findings from the flow chart
- Implement evidence-based interventions such as:
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Implementing interventions without understanding the current process - leads to wasted resources and ineffective changes
- Focusing only on patient education without addressing system barriers
- Single-component interventions - ACIP notes these "will likely have minimal effectiveness" 1
- Failing to engage all stakeholders in the flow chart creation process
By starting with a flow chart of the current process, the clinic will establish a solid foundation for subsequent quality improvement efforts, ultimately leading to improved influenza vaccination rates and better patient outcomes.