Best Investigation for a Patient with History of Right Hemicolectomy Presenting with Right Lower Quadrant Pain, Weight Loss, and Constipation
Colonoscopy is the best investigation for this patient with a history of right hemicolectomy for T1a, N0, M0 colon cancer who now presents with right lower quadrant pain, weight loss, and constipation for 3 months. 1
Rationale for Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy is the preferred first-line investigation in this case for several important reasons:
Direct visualization and biopsy capability: Colonoscopy allows direct visualization of the anastomotic site and remaining colon, with the ability to obtain biopsies of any suspicious lesions 2.
Detection of local recurrence: The patient's symptoms (right lower quadrant pain, weight loss, constipation) are concerning for local recurrence at the anastomotic site, which colonoscopy can directly visualize.
Guideline recommendations: ESMO guidelines strongly recommend colonoscopy as part of follow-up after colon cancer resection, stating it must be carried out at year 1 and every 3-5 years thereafter to look for metachronous adenomas and cancers 2, 1.
Timing considerations: The patient is 3 years post-surgery, which falls within the critical surveillance period. ESMO guidelines note that 82% of stage III and 74% of stage II colon cancer recurrences are diagnosed within the first 3 years after primary cancer resection 2.
Alternative Imaging Options and Their Limitations
CT Scan (Option B)
- While CT scan can detect metastatic spread and complications like perforation or obstruction 2, it has limited sensitivity for early colon cancer detection.
- CT has only 70.2% sensitivity and 79.2% specificity for T staging, with poor agreement between CT and histopathology for individual T stages 3.
- However, CT would be an appropriate second-line investigation if colonoscopy is inconclusive or shows a lesion requiring further evaluation.
PET Scan (Option C)
- PET is not recommended as a first-line investigation.
- ESMO guidelines specifically state that "the routine use of positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analogue 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) is not recommended at the time of initial diagnosis" 2.
- PET is classified as a Grade III recommendation (lowest priority) and is only recommended when there is clinical suspicion of recurrence while routine imaging is negative 1.
Ultrasound (Option D)
- While ultrasound may be useful for detecting liver metastases, its sensitivity is lower than CT (0.43 vs 0.67) 2.
- It is not the optimal first-line investigation for evaluating the anastomotic site or intraluminal recurrence.
MRI (Option E)
- MRI has excellent soft tissue resolution but has not been adequately evaluated for this specific indication 1.
- It might be useful for locally advanced tumors but is not the first-line investigation for suspected recurrence.
Follow-up Algorithm After Initial Colonoscopy
If colonoscopy reveals a lesion:
- Obtain biopsies for histopathological confirmation
- If positive for recurrence, proceed with CT chest/abdomen/pelvis for staging
If colonoscopy is negative but symptoms persist:
- Proceed with abdominal CT scan to evaluate for extraluminal recurrence or other causes of symptoms
- Consider CEA testing (if not already done) as CEA rise is often the first signal of recurrence 2
Further investigations based on findings:
Important Considerations
- The patient's original cancer was early stage (T1a, N0, M0), but the current symptoms are concerning for recurrence.
- The timing (3 years post-surgery) is significant as most recurrences occur within the first 3 years 2.
- Weight loss combined with localized symptoms significantly increases the likelihood of recurrence or metachronous cancer.
- The right lower quadrant pain may indicate recurrence at the anastomotic site, which is best visualized directly with colonoscopy.