What is pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (pacemaker-induced heart muscle disease)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy is a form of heart dysfunction that develops as a result of chronic right ventricular pacing, leading to reduced cardiac efficiency and eventual heart failure, as supported by the American Heart Association's scientific statement 1.

Definition and Mechanism

Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy occurs when the artificial electrical stimulation from a pacemaker causes dyssynchronous ventricular contraction. This condition typically develops after prolonged periods of high percentage right ventricular pacing, usually exceeding 40% of heartbeats. The proposed mechanisms include myocardial energy depletion and decreased energy utilization, myocardial ischemia, and abnormal calcium handling 1.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

The condition is characterized by biventricular dilatation, decreased contractility, and elevated filling pressures. Patients may present with symptoms of heart failure, such as shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling. Diagnosis is typically made using echocardiography to detect early signs of ventricular dysfunction.

Management and Treatment

Management involves minimizing right ventricular pacing when possible by programming the pacemaker to allow intrinsic conduction, using alternative pacing sites such as the His bundle or left ventricular lead placement (cardiac resynchronization therapy), or upgrading to a biventricular pacing system 1. Standard heart failure medications are also important, including ACE inhibitors or ARBs, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists when appropriate. Regular echocardiographic monitoring is essential for patients with high pacing burdens to detect early signs of ventricular dysfunction.

Key Considerations

  • The condition is potentially reversible if identified early and appropriate interventions are implemented to restore more physiologic ventricular activation patterns.
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be considered for suspected cardiomyopathy caused by left bundle branch block (LBBB) 1.
  • Radiofrequency ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs, including β-blockers, may be effective in reducing premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden and improving ventricular function in patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy 1.

From the Research

Definition of Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy

  • Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is defined as a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of chronic, high-burden right ventricular pacing 2.
  • It is characterized by a decrease of ≥10% in LVEF, resulting in LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy 3, 4.

Prevalence and Risk Factors

  • The pooled prevalence of PICM was 12% (95% confidence interval 11%-14%) 5.
  • Risk factors for PICM include male sex, history of myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, native QRS duration, right ventricular pacing percentage, and paced QRS duration 5.

Management and Treatment

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may reverse PICM, with 72% of severe PICM patients achieving LVEF >35% 4.
  • CRT upgrade has been shown to improve LVEF significantly, from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post-CRT upgrade (P < .01) 3.
  • His-bundle pacing is also a potential treatment strategy for PICM 5.

Comparison of Leadless and Traditional Pacemakers

  • The incidence of PICM was high in both leadless pacemaker (LP) and transvenous pacemaker (TVP) groups, with no significant difference in CRT upgrade between LP and TVP 6.
  • RV time, a surrogate for how long the RV was paced, was significantly different between LP and TVP, but did not affect the incidence of PICM or CRT upgrade 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.