Treatment Options for Heart Block
Treatment of heart block should follow a stepwise approach based on the type of block, symptoms, and hemodynamic stability, with permanent pacing indicated for symptomatic second-degree or third-degree AV block that is not due to reversible causes. 1
Initial Assessment and Management
Acute Medical Therapy for Symptomatic AV Block
First-line medication:
- Atropine 0.5-1 mg IV is reasonable for patients with second-degree or third-degree AV block at the AV nodal level with symptoms or hemodynamic compromise 1, 2
- Can be repeated every 3-5 minutes as needed (maximum total dose of 3 mg) 2
- Caution: Atropine has limited effectiveness in infranodal block and may be ineffective in type II second-degree or third-degree AV block with wide QRS complexes 3
Second-line medications (if atropine fails):
- Beta-adrenergic agonists may be considered for symptomatic second-degree or third-degree AV block with low likelihood for coronary ischemia 1:
- Isoproterenol (2-10 μg/min IV infusion)
- Dopamine (2-10 μg/kg/min IV infusion)
- Dobutamine
- Epinephrine
- Beta-adrenergic agonists may be considered for symptomatic second-degree or third-degree AV block with low likelihood for coronary ischemia 1:
Special situations:
Temporary Pacing
Transcutaneous pacing:
Temporary transvenous pacing:
Permanent Pacing
Indications for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Definite indications (Class I):
Reasonable indications (Class IIa):
May be considered (Class IIb):
- Symptomatic second-degree or third-degree AV block associated with thyroid function abnormalities without clinical myxedema 1
Pacing Mode Selection
- Dual-chamber pacing is recommended for patients in sinus rhythm 2
- Single-chamber ventricular pacing is reasonable for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation or significant comorbidities 1, 2
Management Based on Type and Etiology of Heart Block
Reversible Causes
Drug-induced AV block:
Lyme carditis:
Acute myocardial infarction:
First-Degree AV Block
- Generally considered benign, but may warrant monitoring
- Permanent pacing may be reasonable when PR interval exceeds 0.3 seconds and causes symptoms similar to pacemaker syndrome 1, 5
- Recent evidence suggests first-degree AV block may be a marker for progression to higher-grade block in some patients 6
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Do not delay pacing in hemodynamically unstable patients with high-grade AV block
- Atropine ineffective in:
- Early vs. late AV block in inferior MI:
- Permanent pacing should not be performed for transient AV block due to reversible and non-recurrent causes that have completely resolved 1
By following this structured approach to heart block management, clinicians can provide appropriate treatment based on the type, etiology, and clinical presentation of AV block to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.