Evidence for Rapid Sequence Induction in Preventing Aspiration
Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is recommended for patients at high risk of aspiration, though there is moderate-quality evidence supporting its use rather than direct evidence of efficacy in preventing aspiration. 1
Risk Factors for Aspiration
RSI should be performed in patients with:
- Inadequate fasting (less than 2 hours for liquids, less than 6 hours for food)
- Active vomiting
- Ileus or sub-ileus
- Impaired protective reflexes
- Gastrointestinal motility disorders
- Pregnancy (third trimester and during birth)
- Bowel and stomach obstruction and distension
- Sepsis
- Patients receiving opioids 1, 2
Components of Rapid Sequence Induction
Patient Positioning
- Head and torso inclined (semi-Fowler) position is suggested during RSI (conditional recommendation, very low-quality evidence) 1
- This position may improve first-pass intubation success through:
- Enhanced preoxygenation via increased functional residual capacity
- Improved laryngeal view
- Reduced risk of clinically significant aspiration 1
Preoxygenation
- Consistent pre-oxygenation with FiO2 of 1.0 (FetO2 > 0.9)
- Oxygen flow > 10 L/min using a completely sealing respiratory mask with capnography
- Duration: 3-5 minutes 2, 3
- High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is suggested when laryngoscopy is expected to be challenging 1
Medication Administration
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (NMBAs):
Induction Agents:
- A sedative-hypnotic induction agent must be used when an NMBA is administered (best practice statement) 1
- Options include etomidate (0.2-0.3 mg/kg IV), propofol, ketamine (1-2 mg/kg IV), or thiopental 3, 2
- The European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care recommends a fast-acting muscle relaxant such as succinylcholine 1-2 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.9-1.2 mg/kg for RSI (strong recommendation, moderate evidence) 1
Opioids:
- Consider pre-treatment with fentanyl (1-3 mcg/kg) to blunt sympathetic response 3
Cricoid Pressure
- Practice varies internationally
- Some evidence suggests cricoid pressure can make intubation more difficult and may not prevent aspiration of gastric contents 1
- If direct laryngoscopy is difficult, cricoid pressure should be released 1
- Use should align with current standard practice in the practitioner's country 1
Ventilation Strategies
- Traditional RSI avoids positive pressure ventilation before securing the airway
- Modified or "controlled" RSI includes gentle bag-mask ventilation before laryngoscopy 1
- In children, experts suggest ventilating with FiO2 0.8 and small peak inspiratory pressure (ideally <15 cmH2O) if SpO2 falls below 95% 1
Gastric Decompression
- Nasogastric tube decompression is advised when benefits outweigh risks in patients at high risk of regurgitation (best practice statement) 1
- Before surgery, gastric emptying with a nasogastric tube is mandatory in patients with ileus and passage or defecation disorders 4
Special Considerations
Pediatric Patients
- "Controlled" or "modified" RSI is often preferred in children to decrease risks of hypoxemia, hemodynamic complications, and difficult intubation 1
- This includes preoxygenation, deep anesthesia with an opiate and hypnotic agent, non-depolarizing muscle relaxant, and gentle bag-mask ventilation before laryngoscopy 1
Difficult Airway Management
- If unexpected difficult airway occurs, a 2nd generation extraglottic airway device should be used 2
- Equipment for difficult airway management should be immediately available 3
Limitations and Caveats
- Despite widespread use, there is limited high-quality evidence specifically demonstrating RSI's efficacy in preventing aspiration
- The incidence of aspiration is rare, but consequences can be severe (death or brain injury) 1
- Three factors reduce aspiration risk: expertise, support from an experienced anesthesiologist, and close monitoring 2
- RSI techniques should be individualized based on patient factors and clinical scenario while maintaining core principles 2
RSI remains the standard of care for patients at high risk of aspiration despite limited direct evidence of efficacy, as the potential benefits in preventing aspiration-related morbidity and mortality outweigh the risks when performed correctly.