Role of Cystatin C in Estimating GFR and Managing Impaired Renal Function
Cystatin C should be used as a confirmatory test for GFR estimation when creatinine-based eGFR is expected to be inaccurate or when more precise GFR assessment is needed for critical clinical decision-making. 1, 2
When to Use Cystatin C
Primary Indications
- When creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) is suspected to be inaccurate 1
- When more accurate GFR assessment is needed for clinical decisions such as:
Specific Patient Populations Benefiting from Cystatin C Testing
Patients with altered muscle mass:
- Extreme athletes
- Individuals with eating disorders
- Amputees
- Spinal cord injury
- Class III obesity 2
Patients with specific dietary patterns:
Patients with chronic illnesses affecting non-GFR determinants:
Patients with eGFRcr of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m² without albuminuria 1, 2
Advantages of Cystatin C Over Creatinine
Less influenced by non-renal factors:
Provides race-neutral GFR estimation:
- Eliminates need for race-based adjustments required with creatinine
- Helps reduce healthcare inequalities 2
Earlier detection of kidney dysfunction:
- Serum cystatin C levels begin to increase when GFR falls below 88 mL/min/1.73 m²
- Serum creatinine typically increases only when GFR falls below 75 mL/min/1.73 m² 4
Better prognostic value:
- More strongly associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events 3
Recommended Approach to GFR Evaluation
Initial assessment: Use serum creatinine and an estimating equation (eGFRcr) 1
If eGFRcr is suspected to be inaccurate OR more accurate assessment is needed:
- Measure cystatin C
- Calculate eGFRcr-cys (combined creatinine-cystatin C equation) 1
If eGFRcr-cys is suspected to be inaccurate OR even more accurate assessment is needed:
- Consider direct GFR measurement using exogenous filtration markers 1
Special consideration: In patients with reduced muscle mass but no other comorbidities, consider using eGFRcys rather than eGFRcr-cys 1
Equations and Accuracy
- The combined creatinine-cystatin C equation (CKD-EPI-Cr-CystC) provides the most accurate GFR estimation 2, 5
- Percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR:
- eGFRcys alone: 81%
- eGFRcys with age, sex, race: 83%
- eGFRcr with age, sex, race: 85%
- eGFRcr-cys with age, sex, race: 89% 5
Laboratory Considerations
- Laboratories should measure cystatin C using assays with calibration traceable to international standard reference materials 2
- Both eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys should be reported in addition to serum cystatin C concentration 1, 2
- eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys levels less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² should be reported as "decreased" 1
Clinical Pitfalls and Limitations
Cystatin C is not completely free of non-GFR determinants:
- Very high levels of inflammation
- High catabolic states
- Exogenous steroid use can affect levels 1
Limited availability and higher cost compared to creatinine testing 6
Standardization of cystatin C assays is still evolving, though improving 6
May underestimate measured GFR by approximately 12%, particularly in low GFR groups 2
By incorporating cystatin C into clinical practice according to these guidelines, clinicians can achieve more accurate GFR estimation, especially in patients where creatinine-based estimates are unreliable, leading to improved diagnosis, staging, and management of kidney disease.