Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) with Cribriform Type, Necrosis, and Calcification (Intermediate Grade 2/3)
Breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy and consideration of tamoxifen is the recommended management approach for intermediate-grade DCIS with necrosis and calcification. 1
Pathological Significance
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with cribriform architecture, necrosis, and calcification classified as intermediate grade 2/3 has specific clinical implications:
- The presence of necrosis, particularly comedonecrosis, increases the risk of local recurrence following breast conservation therapy 1
- Calcifications are important radiographic markers that help guide surgical excision 1
- Intermediate nuclear grade with necrosis places this lesion in a higher risk category than low-grade DCIS without necrosis 1
Management Algorithm
Step 1: Complete Pathological Assessment
- Confirm complete histological examination of the specimen
- Verify reporting of:
- Nuclear grade (2/3 in this case)
- Architectural pattern (cribriform)
- Presence of necrosis
- Presence and distribution of calcifications
- Margin status 1
Step 2: Surgical Management
- Breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) is appropriate for most cases of intermediate-grade DCIS
- Ensure negative surgical margins (the pathologist should clearly specify whether DCIS is transected at the surgical margin) 1
- Consider re-excision if margins are positive or close
- Mastectomy may be considered if:
Step 3: Adjuvant Therapy
Radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery:
Hormonal therapy (tamoxifen):
Step 4: Axillary Management
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy is generally not indicated for pure DCIS
- Consider sentinel node biopsy if:
- The lesion is large (>4 cm)
- High-grade DCIS with extensive comedonecrosis
- Mastectomy is planned (as it cannot be performed later if invasion is found) 1
Risk Stratification Considerations
The presence of specific features affects recurrence risk:
- Negative estrogen receptor status increases risk of margin involvement (OR: 5.2) 4
- Mammographic extent >30mm is associated with >50% risk of requiring secondary surgery for margins 4
- The combination of cribriform architecture and necrosis places this in an intermediate-to-high risk category 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Underestimation of disease extent: DCIS often extends beyond visible calcifications on mammography. Careful correlation between imaging and pathology is essential 1
Inadequate margins: Microscopic extension of DCIS to surgical margins usually requires further surgery. Specimen radiography and post-excision mammography are complementary in assessing completeness of excision 1
Overtreatment concerns: Not all DCIS will progress to invasive cancer, with less than 1% of DCIS patients developing invasive breast cancer annually 5. However, we cannot yet reliably identify which lesions will remain indolent
Missing invasive components: As many as 20% of patients diagnosed with DCIS on image-guided biopsy will have invasive carcinoma identified when the entire lesion is removed 1
The management of DCIS has evolved significantly, with acceptance of smaller excision margins and more frequent use of radiation therapy leading to decreased re-excision rates and final mastectomy rates without significant increases in local recurrence 2.