What is the treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) should be risk-stratified based on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) like azacitidine being the standard of care for higher-risk MDS, while lower-risk MDS treatment focuses on managing cytopenias with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, lenalidomide, or luspatercept. 1

Risk Stratification

Risk stratification is essential for determining the appropriate treatment approach:

  • IPSS-R Categories:

    • Very low/Low risk: Median survival 5.3-8.8 years
    • Intermediate risk: Median survival 3.0 years
    • High/Very high risk: Median survival 0.8-1.6 years 2
  • Risk factors considered:

    • Cytogenetic abnormalities
    • Bone marrow blast percentage
    • Hemoglobin level
    • Platelet count
    • Absolute neutrophil count 1

Treatment Algorithm for MDS

Lower-Risk MDS (IPSS-R Very Low, Low, Intermediate)

  1. Anemia management:

    • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) ± G-CSF

      • First-line for patients with serum erythropoietin <500 U/L
      • Response rate: 40-60% 1
    • Lenalidomide

      • First-line for patients with del(5q)
      • Response rate: 60-65% 1
    • Luspatercept

      • For patients with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) or SF3B1 mutation 1
    • Immunosuppressive therapy (ATG ± cyclosporine)

      • For younger patients (<65 years) who failed ESA treatment
      • Response rate: 25-40% 1
  2. If failing above options:

    • Hypomethylating agents (HMAs)
      • Response rate: 30-40% 1

Higher-Risk MDS (IPSS-R High, Very High)

  1. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT)

    • Only potentially curative option
    • Consider for eligible patients ≤70 years with available donor 1
  2. If not eligible for transplantation:

    • Azacitidine

      • Standard of care
      • Recommended over decitabine due to demonstrated survival advantage over conventional care regimens 2
      • Dosage: 75 mg/m²/day subcutaneously for 7 days every 28 days
      • Minimum 6 courses recommended to properly evaluate efficacy 2
    • Decitabine

      • Alternative HMA option
      • Dosage options:
        • Three-day regimen: 15 mg/m² by continuous IV infusion over 3 hours repeated every 8 hours for 3 days, cycle every 6 weeks
        • Five-day regimen: 20 mg/m² by continuous IV infusion over 1 hour daily for 5 days, cycle every 4 weeks 3

Supportive Care

  • Red blood cell transfusions

    • For symptomatic anemia
    • Recommended hemoglobin threshold: at least 8 g/dL (9-10 g/dL with comorbidities) 1
  • Platelet transfusions

    • For thrombocytopenia with bleeding or high bleeding risk
  • Antibiotics

    • For infections in neutropenic patients
  • Iron chelation therapy

    • For heavily transfused patients
    • Goal: decrease ferritin levels to <1000 mcg/L 1

Response Assessment

  • Response criteria based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 recommendations:

    • Complete remission (CR)
    • Partial remission (PR)
    • Stable disease with hematological improvement (HI)
    • Progression 2
  • Achievement of hematological improvement (HI) should be considered indicative of response, as it has been associated with prolongation of survival 2

Important Clinical Considerations

  • At least 6 courses of azacitidine are recommended before evaluating efficacy, as many patients respond only after several courses 2

  • AML-like intensive chemotherapy has limited indications in higher-risk MDS patients 2

  • Azacitidine before HSCT appears promising and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials 2

  • The use of HMAs in lower-risk MDS patients who fail other therapies or have multiple cytopenias should be considered 4

  • Regular follow-up with complete blood counts and assessment of stability of blood counts over time is essential, with repeat bone marrow examinations as clinically indicated 1

References

Guideline

Management of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

New Approaches to Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treatment.

Current treatment options in oncology, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.