Understanding Number Needed to Treat (NNT) of 6.4
Number Needed to Treat (NNT) of 6.4 means that approximately 6-7 patients need to be treated with the intervention to prevent one additional adverse outcome compared to the control treatment.
Definition and Calculation of NNT
NNT is a statistical measure used to evaluate the effectiveness of medical interventions. It represents the average number of patients who need to receive a specific treatment to prevent one additional adverse outcome or achieve one additional beneficial outcome.
The calculation of NNT is straightforward:
- NNT = 1 / Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)
- ARR = Control Event Rate (CER) - Experimental Event Rate (EER) 1, 2
For example, with an NNT of 6.4:
- This means the absolute risk reduction is approximately 0.156 or 15.6% (1/6.4 = 0.156)
- The value is always rounded up to the next whole number for clinical interpretation, so an NNT of 6.4 would be reported as 7 in practice 2
Interpreting NNT Values
The lower the NNT, the more effective the treatment:
- NNT < 10: Very effective treatment
- NNT 10-20: Effective treatment
- NNT > 20: Less effective treatment 1
With an NNT of 6.4, this intervention would be considered very effective, as only about 7 patients need to be treated to prevent one additional adverse outcome.
Important Considerations When Interpreting NNT
Time Horizon: NNT must always be interpreted within the specific time frame of the study 1
- An NNT of 6.4 over 1 year is very different from an NNT of 6.4 over 10 years
Population Context: NNT values are specific to the population studied and their baseline risk 1, 3
- Higher baseline risk populations generally have lower NNTs for the same intervention
- The NNT from one population should not be applied to a different population with different baseline risks
Specific Intervention: The NNT applies only to the specific intervention studied 3
- Different interventions targeting the same condition may have different NNTs
Clinical Context Examples:
- In diabetes prevention: An NNT of 6.4 means that approximately 7 high-risk individuals would need to receive the intervention to prevent one case of diabetes
- In cardiovascular disease: For children aged 5 years, an NNT of 6 was observed for preventing both asthma symptoms and asthma medication use with SLIT-T treatment 4
- In hypertension management: NNT values vary based on biomarker status and blood pressure classification 4
Balancing Benefits and Harms
When evaluating an intervention with an NNT of 6.4, it's important to consider:
Number Needed to Harm (NNH): This represents how many patients need to be treated to cause one additional adverse event 1
- The Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed (LHH) can be calculated as NNH/NNT
Cost-effectiveness: Even with a favorable NNT, cost considerations may impact implementation decisions
Patient preferences: Some patients may value avoiding certain outcomes more than others
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Not specifying the time horizon when reporting or interpreting an NNT
- Averaging NNTs from different studies with different populations
- Not considering baseline risk when applying an NNT to clinical practice
- Not reporting confidence intervals with the NNT 1
In summary, an NNT of 6.4 indicates a relatively effective intervention where approximately 7 patients need to be treated to prevent one additional adverse outcome. This should be interpreted within the specific context of the study population, time frame, and intervention used.