What is the recommended MRI for a patient with a left aortic arch and an aberrant right subclavian artery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MRI Recommendation for Left Aortic Arch with Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery

For patients with a left aortic arch and an aberrant right subclavian artery, a dedicated cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) study is recommended to evaluate for associated thoracic aortic aneurysm and to assess the presence and size of any Kommerell's diverticulum. 1, 2

Rationale for CMR Imaging

CMR offers several advantages for evaluating this aortic arch anomaly:

  • Provides comprehensive assessment of vascular anatomy without ionizing radiation
  • Allows visualization of potential Kommerell's diverticulum (present in 20-60% of cases)
  • Enables measurement of critical diameters that guide treatment decisions:
    • Diverticulum orifice diameter
    • Combined diameter of diverticulum and adjacent descending aorta
  • Permits evaluation of tracheal and esophageal compression
  • Allows assessment of flow dynamics to both lungs

Key Measurements and Findings to Assess

When performing CMR for a patient with left aortic arch and aberrant right subclavian artery, the following should be specifically evaluated:

  1. Presence and size of Kommerell's diverticulum - critical for determining need for intervention 1, 2

    • Measure diverticulum orifice diameter (radially and longitudinally at the aortic wall)
    • Measure combined diameter of diverticulum and adjacent descending aorta
  2. Evidence of thoracic aortic aneurysm - left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery is significantly associated with thoracic aortic dissection in 2-8% of patients 1

  3. Compression of adjacent structures:

    • Tracheal compression
    • Esophageal compression (which may cause dysphagia)
  4. Course of the aberrant vessel - typically retroesophageal 1

Clinical Implications and Management

The findings from CMR directly guide management decisions:

  • No intervention needed if:

    • No Kommerell's diverticulum present
    • Diverticulum orifice <3.0 cm
    • Combined diameter of diverticulum and adjacent descending aorta <5.0 cm
    • Patient is asymptomatic
  • Surgical intervention recommended when:

    • Diverticulum orifice >3.0 cm
    • Combined diameter of diverticulum and adjacent descending aorta >5.0 cm
    • Significant symptoms present (dysphagia, respiratory symptoms)

Important Considerations

  • CMR is preferred over CT in younger patients to avoid radiation exposure 1
  • 3D reconstruction capabilities of CMR are valuable for surgical planning 1
  • Regular follow-up imaging is recommended to monitor for development or enlargement of Kommerell's diverticulum 2
  • Patients with aberrant subclavian arteries should be referred to a cardiovascular surgeon or interventional radiologist for evaluation if symptomatic or if associated with Kommerell's diverticulum 2

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failure to obtain adequate imaging of the entire thoracic aorta when an aberrant subclavian artery is discovered
  • Inadequate measurement technique for Kommerell's diverticulum
  • Missing associated congenital cardiac anomalies that may be present
  • Overlooking compression of adjacent structures that may cause symptoms

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Aortic Arch Anomalies

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.