Determination of Best Practices in Anesthesia Care
Best practices in anesthesia care are primarily determined through clinical practice guidelines published by major anesthesiology societies, though these guidelines are heavily reliant on expert opinion rather than high-quality scientific evidence. 1 This approach reflects the complex nature of anesthesiology practice, where patient safety must be balanced with clinical effectiveness and emerging evidence.
Evidence Base for Anesthesia Guidelines
The quality of evidence supporting anesthesiology guidelines is concerning:
- Less than 20% of recommendations in anesthesiology clinical practice guidelines are supported by the highest level of evidence (Level A - consistent evidence from well-performed randomized controlled trials) 1
- Approximately 50% of recommendations are based on Level C evidence (expert opinion, case studies, or observational studies with significant limitations) 1
- A systematic review of North American and European perioperative care guidelines between 2010-2020 found that many recommendations rely heavily on expert consensus rather than rigorous scientific validation 2
Guideline Development Process
Anesthesiology best practices are established through a structured methodology:
- Systematic evidence evaluation: Guidelines use the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology to assess evidence quality 2
- Expert consensus: When high-quality evidence is lacking, recommendations are formulated through expert consensus 2
- Stakeholder input: Feedback is solicited from practicing anesthesiologists, with surveys often showing 85-100% agreement with proposed recommendations 2
- Quality assessment: Guidelines themselves are evaluated using tools like AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) to ensure methodological rigor 2
Hierarchy of Evidence in Anesthesia Practice
The strength of recommendations follows a clear hierarchy:
- Strong recommendations (GRADE 1+): Require at least 70% expert agreement and are based on high-quality evidence showing clear benefit 2
- Weak recommendations (GRADE 2+): Require at least 50% expert agreement with less than 20% opposition, often based on moderate-quality evidence 2
- No recommendation: Made when evidence is equivocal or insufficient
Patient Safety as the Primary Driver
Patient safety considerations strongly influence anesthesia best practices:
- Anesthesiology has been a leader in medicine for patient safety research and implementing standards of care 3
- Mortality directly attributable to anesthesia has dropped by nearly 99% over the past 60 years 2
- Studies show that anesthesiologist-directed care is associated with lower 30-day mortality and better rescue from complications 4
Common Pitfalls in Guideline Implementation
Several challenges affect the implementation of best practices:
- Over-reliance on expert opinion: Many recommendations lack high-quality evidence, potentially leading to practice variation 2
- Balancing competing priorities: Environmental concerns versus patient outcomes must be carefully weighed 2
- Resource limitations: Best practices may need adaptation based on available resources, especially in different global settings 3
Future Directions
To strengthen the evidence base for anesthesia best practices:
- Increase well-performed randomized and observational trials in perioperative medicine 1
- Develop comprehensive research agendas involving anesthesiologists, surgeons, public health experts, and patients 1
- Increase investment in perioperative medicine research to address evidence gaps 1
Best practices in anesthesia will continue to evolve as new evidence emerges, but the primary focus remains on patient safety, mortality reduction, and quality of life improvement, even as other considerations (such as environmental impact) are increasingly incorporated into practice guidelines 2.