Are there research papers on the CapsoVision (capsule endoscopy) capsule?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Research Papers on CapsoVision Capsule Endoscopy

Yes, there are multiple research papers on the CapsoVision capsule endoscopy system, which offers a unique panoramic 360° imaging approach compared to traditional forward-viewing capsule systems.

Overview of CapsoVision Technology

CapsoVision produces the CapsoCam system, which differs from other capsule endoscopy systems in several key ways:

  • Panoramic Imaging: Uses four cameras to provide a 360° lateral view of the small bowel 1, 2
  • No External Recorder: Unlike other systems, CapsoCam stores images internally rather than transmitting to an external receiver 1, 3
  • Retrieval Requirement: The capsule must be retrieved after expulsion to download the recorded images 1

Key Research Studies on CapsoVision

Comparative Studies

A prospective randomized comparison study published in Endoscopy (2014) compared the CapsoCam with PillCam SB2 in patients with obscure digestive bleeding 1:

  • 60 analyzable patients completed both capsule procedures
  • Good diagnostic concordance with kappa value of 0.63
  • Comparable diagnostic yield: 46.7% with CapsoCam vs. 48.3% with PillCam SB2
  • CapsoCam detected significantly more lesions (108 vs. 85, p=0.001)
  • Reading time was longer for CapsoCam (32.0 vs. 26.2 minutes, p=0.002)

Clinical Feasibility Studies

A 2013 pilot study in the Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology evaluated the CapsoCam SV1 2:

  • Complete small bowel examination in all procedures
  • Mean small bowel transit time of 258 ± 136 minutes
  • Duodenal papilla (a challenging landmark) was identified in 71% of patients
  • No adverse reactions were observed

Remote Access Applications

A 2021 study during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the feasibility of remote CapsoCam Plus administration 3:

  • 94 patients included (28 in remote access program via mail courier)
  • Complete examination achieved in 87 patients (92.6%)
  • No difference in completion rate between in-person and remote groups
  • Higher diagnostic yield in the remote access group
  • Only one patient required endoscopic retrieval of the capsule

Clinical Applications of Capsule Endoscopy

According to clinical practice guidelines, capsule endoscopy is recommended in several clinical scenarios 4:

  • Suspected, known, or relapsed Crohn's disease when other studies are negative
  • Celiac disease with unexplained symptoms despite treatment
  • Overt gastrointestinal bleeding with negative findings on upper endoscopy and colonoscopy
  • Selected cases of unexplained mild chronic iron-deficiency anemia
  • Surveillance in patients with polyposis syndromes

Technical Considerations and Limitations

  • Capsule Retention: Occurs in approximately 1.7% of cases, requiring surgical removal 5
  • Technical Issues: In comparative studies, CapsoCam had more technical issues (11) than PillCam SB2 (2) 1
  • Retrieval Challenges: About 2.1% of patients may miss capsule retrieval 3

Future Developments

Capsule endoscopy technology continues to evolve, with potential for:

  • Remote administration capabilities, especially valuable during pandemic situations 3
  • Improved diagnostic yield through panoramic viewing 1, 2
  • Potential applications beyond small bowel, including esophageal and colonic versions 4, 6

The CapsoVision capsule represents an important advancement in capsule endoscopy technology, offering comparable diagnostic yield to traditional systems while providing panoramic imaging capabilities that may detect more lesions in certain clinical scenarios.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.