What diagnostic tests are used to differentiate between Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Tests to Differentiate Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

The definitive diagnostic test to differentiate between Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is an excisional lymph node biopsy with immunohistochemistry analysis, as fine needle aspiration is inadequate for initial diagnosis. 1, 2

Biopsy and Histopathology

  • Excisional biopsy: Gold standard for diagnosis

    • Incisional biopsy is acceptable when excisional is not possible
    • Core needle biopsy may be considered when excisional/incisional not feasible, but nondiagnostic samples must be followed by excisional biopsy 1
  • Histopathologic examination:

    • Hodgkin lymphoma: Characterized by presence of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells 1
    • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Lacks HRS cells, shows various patterns of lymphocyte proliferation

Immunohistochemistry (Critical for Differentiation)

  • Hodgkin lymphoma markers:

    • HRS cells consistently positive for CD30 and CD15
    • Occasionally positive for CD20
    • Negative for CD45 1
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma markers:

    • Varies by subtype, but typically:
    • Positive for CD20 and CD45
    • Negative for CD15 and CD30 1, 2
  • NLPHL-specific markers (Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma):

    • Lymphocyte predominant (LP) cells express CD20 and CD45
    • Lack CD15 and CD30 expression 1

Advanced Diagnostic Testing

  • Flow cytometry: Essential for NHL diagnosis and subtyping 1, 2

    • Helps identify specific cell populations and their immunophenotype
    • Particularly useful for distinguishing B-cell vs. T-cell origins
  • Molecular studies:

    • Used when appropriate to accurately categorize lymphoma subtypes
    • May include PCR for gene rearrangements or FISH for specific translocations 1

Imaging Studies

  • PET-CT scan: Preferred for staging FDG-avid lymphomas (most HL and aggressive NHL) 1, 3

    • Provides metabolic information and anatomic localization
    • More sensitive than CT alone for extranodal involvement 4
    • Can help identify optimal biopsy sites in suspected cases of discordant histology 1
  • Contrast-enhanced CT: Used for non-FDG-avid lymphomas and for precise nodal measurements 1

    • Provides detailed anatomic information
    • Less sensitive than PET-CT for bone marrow involvement 5

Bone Marrow Assessment

  • PET-CT: Now considered adequate for determination of bone marrow involvement in HL 1

    • Bone marrow biopsy no longer indicated in patients with HL undergoing PET-CT evaluation 1
  • Bone marrow biopsy: Still recommended for complete staging in NHL 2

    • Provides information on bone marrow infiltration pattern
    • Helps identify discordant histology in bone marrow

Laboratory Tests

  • Complete blood count with differential: Required for all patients 2
  • Comprehensive metabolic panel: Including liver and kidney function tests 2
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH): Important prognostic marker 2
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP): Particularly important for HL 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying on fine-needle aspiration: Inadequate for initial diagnosis of lymphoma 1, 2
  2. Incomplete immunophenotyping: May lead to misclassification between HL and NHL subtypes
  3. Starting treatment without definitive diagnosis: Always confirm diagnosis before initiating therapy
  4. Overlooking extranodal disease: PET-CT is superior to CT for detecting extranodal involvement 4
  5. Assuming all lymphomas are FDG-avid: Some indolent NHL subtypes may have variable FDG uptake 1

Special Considerations

  • For suspected relapse, confirmatory biopsy is strongly recommended 2
  • In cases of suspected transformation (indolent to aggressive NHL), PET-CT can help identify the optimal biopsy site 1
  • Processing of biopsy specimens should include preservation of fresh-frozen tissue when possible for additional studies 1

The diagnostic approach should be comprehensive, with the pathological diagnosis made according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system by an experienced hematopathologist.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.