Surgical Options for Severe Treatment-Resistant Cervical Dystonia
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus is the preferred surgical option for severe, treatment-resistant cervical dystonia that has failed to respond to at least three adequate medication trials and botulinum toxin injections. 1
Patient Selection Criteria for Surgical Intervention
Surgical options should be considered only after failure of:
- At least three adequate medication trials (including anti-dopaminergic drugs and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists)
- Botulinum toxin injections (both type A and potentially type B)
- Each medication trial should be at adequate dosage for at least 4 weeks 1
Patients must demonstrate:
Surgical Options Hierarchy
First-Line Surgical Option:
- Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
- Target: Bilateral globus pallidus
- Advantages:
- Considerations:
- Improvement may not be immediate; effects can build up over weeks to months 1
- Requires programming expertise and battery replacement
- Higher upfront cost but potentially better long-term outcomes
Second-Line Surgical Options:
Selective Peripheral Denervation
- Most commonly performed peripheral surgical procedure 2
- Modified Bertrand procedure involves:
- C2-6 denervation
- Myectomy of the splenius capitis and/or semispinalis capitis
- Myotomy of the levator scapulae when indicated
- Myotomy and selective denervation of the sternocleidomastoid 4
- Best reserved for cervical dystonia refractory to botulinum toxin injections 3
Selective Dorsal Ramisectomy
- Has shown consistent results among peripheral surgical options 2
- Lower efficacy compared to DBS but may be appropriate for patients who are not candidates for DBS
Emerging/Less Common Surgical Options:
- Cervical Dorsal Root Entry Zone (DREZ) Operation
- May be considered as an alternative surgical treatment for segmental dystonia located in extremities
- Can be used as a complementary procedure when other surgical interventions provide incomplete relief 5
Risk-Benefit Considerations
- Surgical risks must be weighed against potential benefits in each individual patient 1
- DBS has a relatively low risk profile and has been shown to be cognitively safe 3
- Peripheral denervation procedures carry risks of:
- Sensory loss
- Weakness
- Potential for incomplete relief or recurrence
Expected Outcomes
Response to DBS in primary dystonia is generally favorable, with marked benefit in:
- Idiopathic generalized dystonia
- Cervical dystonia
- Segmental dystonia
- Meige syndrome
- Myoclonus-dystonia 3
Patients with tardive dystonia may gain similar improvement to those with idiopathic dystonia 3
Peripheral procedures typically provide less complete relief than DBS but may be appropriate in selected cases
Important Caveats
- Despite surgical advances, all current surgical treatments are palliative, not curative
- Regular follow-up is essential to monitor for complications and adjust treatment as needed
- Patients should have realistic expectations about the degree of symptom relief
- The combination of techniques utilized depends on the subtype and severity of cervical dystonia 4