How should a patient with a large patent foramen ovale (PFO) and sinus tachycardia be managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of a Patient with Large PFO and Sinus Tachycardia

Patients with a large patent foramen ovale (PFO) and sinus tachycardia should be managed with PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy if they have had a cryptogenic stroke or TIA, are between 18-60 years old, and the PFO is determined to be the most likely cause of the event after thorough evaluation.

Initial Assessment of PFO and Sinus Tachycardia

Diagnostic Workup

  • Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with saline contrast injection is the diagnostic technique of choice for confirming PFO and assessing its characteristics 1
  • Evaluate for high-risk PFO features:
    • Atrial septal aneurysm
    • Large interatrial shunt
    • Substantial right-to-left shunt 2
  • Assess sinus tachycardia separately:
    • Rule out other cardiac causes (structural heart disease, heart failure)
    • Evaluate for non-cardiac causes (dehydration, anemia, hyperthyroidism, anxiety)
    • Consider 24-hour Holter monitoring to characterize the tachycardia

Risk Stratification

  • Age consideration: PFO closure is primarily indicated for patients aged 18-60 years 1, 2
  • Stroke history: Determine if the patient has had a cryptogenic stroke or TIA
  • Evaluate for competing stroke etiologies: Rule out other causes of stroke/embolism
  • Assess for deep vein thrombosis (DVT): Ultrasound examination of lower extremities to evaluate for potential source of paradoxical embolism 1

Management Algorithm

For Patients with History of Stroke/TIA

  1. If patient is 18-60 years with non-lacunar cryptogenic stroke/TIA and high-risk PFO features:

    • PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is recommended 1, 2
    • This approach has demonstrated significant reduction in recurrent stroke rates:
      • CLOSE trial: 0% stroke rate in PFO closure group vs. 6.0% in antiplatelet-only group 2
      • REDUCE trial: 1.4% ischemic stroke rate in closure group vs. 5.4% in antiplatelet-only group 2
  2. If patient is >60 years:

    • PFO closure should rarely be performed unless exceptional clinical circumstances exist 1
    • Antiplatelet therapy is generally preferred 2
  3. If patient requires long-term anticoagulation for another reason:

    • Continue anticoagulation without PFO closure 2
    • Individual risk-benefit assessment should guide decision-making

For Patients without Stroke/TIA History

  1. For asymptomatic PFO:

    • Antithrombotic therapy is not recommended 1
    • Monitor for symptoms and manage sinus tachycardia separately
  2. For patients with evidence of paradoxical embolism (e.g., DVT with systemic embolism):

    • Consider PFO closure when technically feasible 1
    • Anticoagulation therapy is indicated until closure can be performed 3, 4

Management of Sinus Tachycardia

  • Treat underlying causes (dehydration, anemia, etc.)
  • Consider beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers if symptomatic and no contraindications
  • Monitor for potential relationship between tachycardia and PFO-related hemodynamics

Post-PFO Closure Management

  • Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1-3 months 5
  • Followed by single antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months 5
  • Monitor for potential complications:
    • Atrial fibrillation (occurs in 4.6-6.6% of patients, mostly transient) 2
    • Device-related adverse events (approximately 1.4% of patients) 2

Important Considerations and Pitfalls

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Overtreatment of incidentally found PFOs without history of cryptogenic stroke
  • Assuming PFO causality in older patients when it's more likely incidental
  • Neglecting thorough evaluation for other stroke etiologies
  • Failing to recognize that small PFOs carry lower risk than those with large shunts or associated atrial septal aneurysms 2

Special Circumstances

  • Thrombus-in-transit through PFO: This is a rare but high-mortality event requiring urgent intervention, typically surgical thrombectomy with PFO closure 3, 4
  • Divers and high-altitude workers: Consider PFO closure for those with history of decompression sickness, even without stroke history 2

By following this structured approach, clinicians can optimize management of patients with large PFO and sinus tachycardia, focusing on stroke prevention while addressing both conditions appropriately.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Guideline

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Large Biatrial Thrombembolus Caught in Transit across a Patent Foramen Ovale.

The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon reports, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.