Is holding therapy a recommended treatment for attachment disorders in children?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Holding Therapy is Not Recommended for Attachment Disorders in Children

Holding therapy is not recommended for the treatment of attachment disorders in children and is considered potentially dangerous, with no empirical evidence supporting its use. 1

Understanding Holding Therapy and Its Risks

Holding therapy (sometimes called "rebirthing therapy") is a controversial intervention that involves physically restraining a child, often against their will, purportedly to promote attachment. This approach carries significant risks:

  • Physical restraint has been associated with multiple deaths in children and adolescents, with 45 deaths attributed to restraint use in psychiatric facilities between 1993 and 2003 2

  • Medical complications can include:

    • Airway obstruction and asphyxia
    • Skin breakdown and neurovascular damage
    • Rhabdomyolysis leading to kidney failure
    • Accidental strangulation
    • Brachial plexus injuries 2
  • Psychological risks include:

    • Traumatization, especially for children with history of abuse
    • Promotion of an aggression-coercion cycle
    • Potential to inflame rather than reduce aggressive behavior 3

Evidence Against Holding Therapy

The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry has explicitly stated in their practice parameter that "coercive treatments with children with attachment disorders are potentially dangerous and not recommended" 1. This position is supported by:

  1. Lack of empirical evidence supporting efficacy
  2. Significant risk of physical and psychological harm
  3. Ethical concerns about forcing physical restraint on vulnerable children

Appropriate Approaches to Attachment Disorders

For children with attachment disorders, evidence-based approaches should focus on:

  • Establishing a secure attachment relationship when none exists
  • Ameliorating disturbed attachment relationships with caregivers 1
  • Using psychodynamic psychotherapy approaches that respect the child's autonomy 3

The British Association for Adoption and Fostering has developed a position statement against holding therapy, emphasizing the importance of finding space to think and feel what the child is communicating without resorting to dangerous interventions 4.

When Physical Restraint May Be Appropriate

It's important to distinguish between therapeutic holding therapy (not recommended) and emergency physical restraint:

  • Emergency physical restraint should only be used:
    • As a last resort when less restrictive measures have failed
    • When there is immediate risk of harm to the child or others
    • With proper training and monitoring
    • For the minimum time necessary (typically averaging 20-30 minutes) 5
    • With continuous monitoring of vital signs 2

Conclusion

The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors emphasizes that restraint should be considered a security measure, not a form of treatment, and should only be used as a last resort 2. For children with attachment disorders, treatment should focus on evidence-based approaches that promote secure attachment without coercion or force.

References

Guideline

Restraint Use in Pediatric Care

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Holding children in mind or holding therapy: developing an ethical position.

Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.