What is the appropriate management for a 36-year-old woman presenting with gross hematuria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Gross Hematuria in a 36-Year-Old Woman

A 36-year-old woman presenting with gross hematuria requires urgent urologic referral for complete evaluation including cystoscopy and upper tract imaging, as gross hematuria carries a high risk of underlying malignancy (>10%) and should never be ignored even if self-limited. 1, 2

Initial Assessment

  • Gross hematuria has a significantly higher association with malignancy (30-40%) compared to microscopic hematuria (2.6-4%), necessitating prompt and thorough evaluation 1
  • All patients with gross hematuria warrant urologic referral, regardless of whether the bleeding is self-limited 1
  • Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is not considered a satisfactory explanation for hematuria and should not prevent full evaluation 1

Diagnostic Workup

Imaging

  • Multiphase CT urography is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating the upper urinary tract in patients with hematuria 1
  • CT urography should include:
    • Unenhanced images
    • IV contrast-enhanced images with nephrographic and excretory phases
    • Thin-slice acquisition 1
  • Alternative imaging options if CT is contraindicated:
    • Ultrasonography (though less sensitive than CT urography) 1
    • MR urography for patients with contrast allergies or renal insufficiency 3

Cystoscopy

  • Complete visualization of the bladder mucosa, urethra, and ureteral orifices is necessary to exclude bladder cancer 1
  • Flexible cystoscopy is preferred as it:
    • Causes less pain than rigid cystoscopy
    • Has fewer post-procedure symptoms
    • Requires simpler positioning and preparation
    • Takes less time to perform 1

Laboratory Testing

  • Urinalysis with microscopic confirmation of hematuria
  • Serum creatinine to assess renal function 1
  • Urine culture to rule out infection as a cause 1
  • Urine cytology is no longer routinely recommended in the initial evaluation 1
  • FDA-approved urine markers for bladder cancer detection (NMP22, BTA stat, ImmunoCyt, UroVysion FISH) are not recommended for initial evaluation 1

Special Considerations

  • Women with hematuria often experience longer delays in referral to urology compared to men (despite women presenting with more advanced disease and having higher case-fatality rates when diagnosed with bladder cancer) 1
  • Common causes of gross hematuria include:
    • Urinary tract malignancy (bladder, kidney, ureter)
    • Urolithiasis
    • Urinary tract infection
    • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (in men) 2, 3

Follow-up

  • Even if initial evaluation is negative, patients with a history of gross hematuria require follow-up due to the intermittent nature of bleeding from urologic malignancies 1
  • Follow-up should include:
    • Repeat urinalysis
    • Blood pressure monitoring
    • Consideration for repeat imaging and cystoscopy if hematuria persists 1
  • Immediate urologic reevaluation is warranted if gross hematuria recurs, urinary cytology becomes abnormal, or irritative voiding symptoms develop in the absence of infection 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Dismissing gross hematuria as self-limited without proper evaluation 1
  • Failing to refer patients with gross hematuria for urologic evaluation (studies show 23-36% of primary care physicians do not routinely refer these patients) 1
  • Attributing hematuria to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy without further investigation 1
  • Neglecting to specifically ask patients about prior episodes of visible blood in the urine, as self-limited gross hematuria is often underreported but highly significant 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Hematuria.

Primary care, 2019

Research

What is significant hematuria for the primary care physician?

The Canadian journal of urology, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.