Beta Blockers vs Diltiazem for Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response
Both beta blockers and diltiazem are recommended as first-line agents for rate control in atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in patients with preserved left ventricular function (LVEF >40%), while beta blockers are preferred in patients with reduced ejection fraction. 1
Initial Treatment Selection Based on Cardiac Function
For Patients with Preserved Left Ventricular Function (LVEF >40%):
- Both beta blockers (metoprolol, esmolol, propranolol) and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) are recommended as first-line agents for rate control in AFib with RVR 1
- Either medication class can effectively control ventricular rate at rest and during exercise 1
- The choice between beta blockers and calcium channel blockers should be based on:
- Comorbid conditions
- Potential side effects
- Patient-specific factors 1
For Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Function (LVEF ≤40%):
- Beta blockers and/or digoxin are recommended as first-line agents 1
- Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) should be avoided due to negative inotropic effects that may worsen heart failure 1
Comparative Efficacy and Safety
Beta Blockers:
- Most effective drug class for rate control in the AFFIRM study, achieving heart rate endpoints in 70% of patients compared to 54% with calcium channel blockers 1
- Better control of exercise-induced tachycardia compared to digoxin 1
- May cause bradycardia, hypotension, bronchospasm, and heart block 1
- Associated with fewer adverse events (10%) compared to diltiazem (19%) in recent meta-analysis 2
Diltiazem:
- Provides rapid rate control and has been associated with improvement in quality of life and exercise tolerance 1
- May achieve rate control more quickly than metoprolol (13 minutes vs. 27 minutes) 3
- Results in greater heart rate reductions at 30 minutes and 60 minutes compared to metoprolol 3
- Higher risk of hypotension, especially with standard dosing (0.25 mg/kg) 4
- Preferred in patients with bronchospasm or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1
Special Considerations
Acute Coronary Syndrome with AFib:
- IV beta blockers are recommended for patients with no heart failure, hemodynamic instability, or bronchospasm 1
- Calcium channel antagonists might be considered only in the absence of significant heart failure or hemodynamic instability 1
Pulmonary Disease:
- Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists (diltiazem) are recommended for patients with COPD and AFib 1
Hyperthyroidism:
- Beta blockers are first-line for rate control in thyrotoxicosis unless contraindicated 1
- Calcium channel antagonists are recommended when beta blockers cannot be used 1
Dosing Considerations
Diltiazem:
- Low-dose diltiazem (≤0.2 mg/kg) may be as effective as standard dose (0.25 mg/kg) with lower risk of hypotension 4
- Efficacy may be influenced by serum calcium levels, with highest response rates observed in patients with normal ionized calcium levels 5
Beta Blockers:
- Metoprolol: 2.5-5 mg IV bolus over 2 minutes, may repeat up to 3 doses 1
- Should be initiated cautiously in patients with heart failure who have reduced ejection fraction 1
Algorithm for Selection:
Assess left ventricular function:
Consider comorbidities:
Consider rate of control needed:
Monitor for adverse effects: