What are the IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) guidelines for treating Enterobacter infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

IDSA Guidelines for Enterobacter Infections

Carbapenems (imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, doripenem) are the first-line agents for treating Enterobacter infections due to the high risk of resistance to other antimicrobials, particularly cephalosporins. 1

Antimicrobial Recommendations

First-line Therapy

  • Carbapenems (imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, doripenem) are the preferred agents for Enterobacter infections due to their stability against AmpC β-lactamases commonly produced by Enterobacter species 1
  • Fourth-generation cephalosporins (cefepime) may be used if Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) production is absent 1, 2

Alternative Therapies

  • Piperacillin-tazobactam can be considered as an alternative, though with caution due to potential resistance 1
  • Fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin) combined with metronidazole may be used in areas with low fluoroquinolone resistance rates (<20%) 1

Resistant Enterobacter Infections

  • For carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter infections, options include 1:
    • Polymyxins (colistin)
    • Tigecycline
    • Fosfomycin
    • Double carbapenem regimen (in selected cases)

Important Considerations

Cephalosporin Resistance

  • First and second-generation cephalosporins are generally ineffective against Enterobacter infections 1
  • Third-generation cephalosporins are not recommended due to the high likelihood of resistance development during therapy, particularly for Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes 1, 3
  • Enterobacter species can develop resistance to cephalosporins during treatment through induction of AmpC β-lactamases 4, 3

Healthcare-Associated vs. Community-Acquired Infections

  • For healthcare-associated Enterobacter infections, broader empiric coverage is recommended due to higher resistance rates 1
  • For community-acquired infections in areas with low resistance rates, more targeted therapy may be appropriate 1

Special Populations

  • For critically ill patients with Enterobacter infections, combination therapy may be initially considered until susceptibility results are available 1
  • Immunocompromised patients may require broader empiric coverage 1

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

  • For bacteremia and most infections, 7-14 days of appropriate therapy is typically sufficient 1
  • Longer courses may be needed for complicated infections, endovascular infections, or in immunocompromised hosts 1
  • Broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy should be tailored when culture and susceptibility reports become available to reduce the number and spectra of administered agents 1

Regional Considerations

  • Local resistance patterns should guide empiric therapy choices, particularly regarding fluoroquinolone use 1
  • In regions with high rates of ESBL-producing or fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (>20%), fluoroquinolones should be avoided for empiric therapy 1

Remember that Enterobacter species can rapidly develop resistance during treatment, particularly with cephalosporins, making carbapenems the safest empiric choice for serious infections until susceptibility results are available 4, 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Cefepime vs other antibacterial agents for the treatment of Enterobacter species bacteremia.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.