What is the frequency of rearrest after Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Frequency of Rearrest After Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)

Rearrest after ROSC occurs in approximately 36-55% of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), representing a significant challenge in post-cardiac arrest care. 1, 2

Incidence of Rearrest

  • Rearrest occurs in 36% (95% CI: 26-46%) of patients who achieve ROSC after OHCA, with a total of 69 rearrest events observed in 41 patients in one observational study 1
  • More recent data indicates the frequency may be even higher, with 54.8% of patients experiencing rearrest after achieving prehospital ROSC in a multi-regional observational study 2
  • For in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA), approximately 61.7% achieve ROSC, but subsequent rearrest can compromise outcomes 3

Timing of Rearrest

  • The median time from ROSC to rearrest is 3.1 minutes (interquartile range: 1.6-6.3 minutes), indicating that most rearrest events occur early after resuscitation 1
  • This short window emphasizes the importance of immediate post-ROSC stabilization and monitoring 4

Types of Rearrest Rhythms

The distribution of rearrest rhythms has been documented as:

  • Pulseless electrical activity (PEA): 37% (95% CI: 26.3-50.2%) 1
  • Pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT): 29% (95% CI: 18.7-41.2%) 1
  • Ventricular fibrillation (VF): 24.6% (95% CI: 15.2-36.5%) 1
  • Asystole: 8.8% (95% CI: 3.3-18.0%) 1

Risk Factors for Rearrest

  • Longer interval from collapse to first prehospital ROSC (OR 1.081; 95% CI 1.050-1.114) is independently associated with rearrest 2
  • A cut-off time of 24 minutes from collapse to first ROSC has been identified as a predictor of rearrest (sensitivity 77%, specificity 54%) 2
  • Initial non-shockable rhythms are associated with higher rates of rearrest 1, 2

Impact on Survival

  • Survival to hospital discharge in patients who experience rearrest is 23.1% (95% CI: 11.1-39.3%), compared to 27.8% (95% CI: 17.9-39.6%) in patients without rearrest 1
  • The presence of an initial shockable rhythm is independently associated with survival after rearrest (OR 6.920; 95% CI 2.749-17.422) 2

Prevention and Management Strategies

  • Post-ROSC care bundles that include hemodynamic stabilization are recommended to potentially reduce rearrest, though evidence for their effectiveness is mixed 5
  • Maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) greater than 65 mm Hg is suggested as part of post-ROSC care to improve outcomes 4
  • Push-dose epinephrine has been associated with decreased odds of rearrest (OR 0.68,95% CI 0.50,0.94) in exploratory analyses 5
  • For patients with ventricular arrhythmias after ROSC, prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs may be considered, though evidence is limited 4
  • Beta-blockers administered for 72 hours after ROSC have shown higher rates of survival in some observational studies 4
  • Lidocaine bolus and/or continuous infusion immediately after ROSC has been associated with lower adjusted rates of recurrence of VF (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.26–0.44) 4

Clinical Implications

  • Healthcare providers should anticipate and be prepared for rearrest, particularly in the first few minutes after achieving ROSC 1, 2
  • Continuous monitoring and immediate access to defibrillation equipment are essential during the post-ROSC period 4
  • Comprehensive post-arrest care requires a multidisciplinary team approach, especially for in-hospital cardiac arrests 4
  • Attention to hemodynamic parameters, ventilation strategies, and addressing the underlying cause of arrest are critical components of preventing rearrest 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.