Treatment of Atrial Arrhythmias
The treatment of atrial fibrillation should follow a dual approach focusing on stroke prevention with anticoagulation and symptom management through either rate or rhythm control strategies, with selection based on patient characteristics and comorbidities. 1
Anticoagulation Therapy
- Administer antithrombotic therapy to all patients with AF except those with lone AF to prevent thromboembolism 2
- Use the CHA₂DS₂-VA score for stroke risk assessment, with anticoagulation therapy considered for scores ≥1 and strongly recommended for scores ≥2 1
- For high-risk patients, provide chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin adjusted to achieve a target INR of 2.0-3.0 2
- Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists like warfarin for most patients 1
- Continue anticoagulation based on stroke risk even after successful rhythm control 1
- Monitor INR at least weekly during initiation of warfarin therapy and monthly when stable 2
Rate Control Strategy
First-line medications:
For patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >40%):
For patients with reduced LVEF (≤40%):
Consider combination therapy with digoxin plus beta-blocker or calcium channel antagonist to control heart rate at rest and during exercise 2
Special situations:
- For AF with WPW syndrome: Avoid beta-blockers, digoxin, diltiazem, and verapamil as they may accelerate ventricular response 2
- For AF with thyrotoxicosis: Use beta-blockers as first-line therapy; if contraindicated, use calcium channel antagonists 2
Rhythm Control Strategy
Indications:
- Symptomatic patients despite adequate rate control
- Younger patients, especially with paroxysmal lone AF
- Patients with AF secondary to a corrected precipitant 2, 3
Cardioversion options:
Immediate electrical cardioversion for:
- Hemodynamic instability
- Acute myocardial infarction with rapid ventricular response
- Symptomatic hypotension
- Angina or cardiac failure unresponsive to medications 2
Pharmacological cardioversion with:
Maintenance of sinus rhythm:
- Amiodarone is more effective than sotalol and propafenone for maintaining sinus rhythm but has more adverse effects 3
- Class IC antiarrhythmic drugs (flecainide, propafenone) are preferred in structurally normal hearts 4
- Avoid Class IC drugs in patients with coronary artery disease or structural heart disease 4
Catheter Ablation
- Consider catheter ablation as a second-line option if antiarrhythmic drugs fail to control AF 1
- May be considered as first-line therapy in selected patients with paroxysmal AF 1
- Particularly beneficial for symptomatic patients with AF involving accessory pathways (WPW syndrome) 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Do not use digitalis as the sole agent to control rapid ventricular response in paroxysmal AF 2
- Do not discontinue anticoagulation after successful rhythm control if the patient has risk factors for stroke 1
- Do not reduce DOAC doses unless patients meet specific dose-reduction criteria 1
- Avoid class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with acute myocardial infarction 2
- Rate control strategy may be preferable to rhythm control in older patients (>65 years) and those with coronary heart disease due to fewer adverse events 3, 5
Treatment Algorithm
- Assess stroke risk and initiate appropriate anticoagulation
- Determine whether rate or rhythm control is appropriate:
- For older patients, those with comorbidities, or minimally symptomatic AF: Rate control
- For younger patients, highly symptomatic patients, or those with new-onset AF: Consider rhythm control
- If rate control chosen:
- Select appropriate medication based on LVEF and comorbidities
- Target heart rate <110 bpm at rest
- If rhythm control chosen:
- Consider cardioversion (electrical or pharmacological)
- Select appropriate antiarrhythmic drug based on cardiac structure
- Consider catheter ablation if drug therapy fails