First-Line Antibiotic Treatment for Bursitis Without Aspiration
For uncomplicated septic bursitis without aspiration, empirical antibiotic therapy with oral antibiotics targeting Staphylococcus aureus is the first-line treatment, with amoxicillin-clavulanate being the preferred choice. 1, 2, 3
Epidemiology and Microbiology
- Septic bursitis is commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (approximately 85% of cases), with beta-hemolytic Streptococcus and Staphylococcus epidermidis being less common causative organisms 4
- The most common types of bursitis include prepatellar, olecranon, trochanteric, and retrocalcaneal 5
Empirical Antibiotic Selection
First-line options:
- Amoxicillin-clavulanate is the preferred first-line antibiotic due to its coverage against S. aureus, including many community-acquired methicillin-resistant strains 1
- Alternative options include:
For patients with beta-lactam allergies:
Treatment Duration and Monitoring
- Standard duration of antibiotic therapy is 7-10 days 1, 4
- Recent evidence suggests that shorter courses (≤7 days) may be as effective as longer courses (>7 days) in non-immunocompromised patients 4
- Clinical improvement should be expected within 48-72 hours of initiating antibiotics 3
- If no improvement is observed after 72 hours, consider:
- Changing antibiotic therapy
- Obtaining imaging (ultrasound) to assess for fluid collection
- Possible aspiration or surgical intervention 1
Special Considerations
- Immunocompromised patients have a higher risk of recurrence and may require longer treatment courses 4
- Severe cases with systemic symptoms (high fever, extensive cellulitis) may require:
- Initial intravenous antibiotics
- Hospitalization
- Possible surgical intervention 4
Evidence for Non-Aspiration Approach
- Recent studies show that empirical antibiotic therapy without aspiration results in successful resolution in approximately 88% of cases of suspected septic olecranon bursitis 3
- Empirical management without aspiration has been associated with fewer complications and lower rates of progression to surgical bursectomy compared to traditional bursal aspiration 2
- The number needed to harm when aspiration was performed was 1.46, suggesting potential risks with routine aspiration 2