HLA Genotype Compatibility Assessment for Transplantation
The two HLA genotypes presented show significant mismatches at multiple loci, which would likely result in a high risk of rejection and graft failure in solid organ transplantation, particularly kidney transplantation where HLA-DQ matching is increasingly recognized as critical for long-term outcomes. 1
Analysis of HLA Mismatches Between the Two Genotypes
Class I HLA Antigens
- Mismatches at HLA-A loci: A29:02:01:01/A03:01:01:01 vs. A01:01:01/A02:01P 1
- Mismatches at HLA-B loci: B15:01:01:01/B44:03:01:01 vs. B38:01:01/B44:02:01 (note: B44:03 and B44:02 are different alleles of the B44 family) 1
- Partial match at HLA-C loci: C16:01:01:01/C03:03:01:01 vs. C05:01:01/C12:03:01 1
Class II HLA Antigens
- Partial match at HLA-DRB1: DRB104:04:01:14/DRB113:01:01:03 vs. DRB104:01:01G/DRB113:01P 1
- Mismatches at HLA-DQB1: DQB104:04:01:14/DQB106:03:01:01 vs. DQB103:01:01/DQB106:03:01 1
- Mismatches at HLA-DQA1: DQA103:01:01:01/DQA101:03:01:02 vs. DQA101:03:01/DQA103:03:01 1
- Partial match at HLA-DPB1: DPB103:01/DPB104:01 vs. DPB102:01/DPB104:01 1
Clinical Significance in Transplantation
Kidney Transplantation
- HLA-DQ mismatches significantly increase the risk of graft loss in both living and deceased donor kidney transplantation (HR 1.12) 1
- HLA-DQ donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are particularly strong, persistent, and resistant to treatment 1
- Patients with 2 HLA-DQ mismatches in their first graft have >50% chance of becoming highly sensitized if they need retransplantation 1
- The DQA1/DQB1 pairing (DQ heterodimer) is critical, as both chains contribute to immunogenicity 1
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- High-resolution matching for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 (8/8 match) is considered the gold standard 2
- HLA-DQB1 matching has shown variable importance in recent studies 2
- These genotypes show mismatches at multiple critical loci, suggesting high risk for graft-versus-host disease 2
Impact on Autoimmune Disease Predisposition
- Specific HLA alleles are associated with over 100 different diseases and phenotypes 3
- HLA typing can provide information about genetic predisposition to autoimmune conditions 4
- The HLA-DQ locus is particularly important in autoimmune disease associations 4, 3
Technical Considerations in HLA Assessment
- High-resolution molecular typing is essential for accurate assessment of compatibility 1, 5
- Both genotypes show allele-level typing, which is more informative than antigen-level typing 1, 5
- The frequency of specific HLA alleles varies significantly between ethnic groups, which impacts matching probability 1
Recommendations for Transplantation Decision-Making
- Consider these genotypes as poorly matched for solid organ transplantation, particularly for kidney transplantation 1
- For kidney transplantation, the HLA-DQ mismatches are especially concerning for long-term outcomes 1
- For hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, these mismatches would likely require more intensive immunosuppression to prevent rejection 2
- If transplantation is necessary despite these mismatches, closer monitoring for rejection and DSA development would be warranted 1
Innovative Approaches to Overcome HLA Barriers
- For patients with rare HLA types, consideration of broader geographic sharing may improve matching 1
- "Sliding scale" point systems in allocation algorithms can help balance equity and utility for patients with uncommon HLA phenotypes 1
- Molecular mismatch analysis (epitope matching) may eventually provide more nuanced assessment of compatibility beyond simple allele matching 1
Common Pitfalls in HLA Assessment
- Focusing only on antigen-level matching rather than allele-level differences (e.g., B44:02 vs. B44:03) 1
- Neglecting the importance of HLA-DQ matching, which has historically been underemphasized 1
- Failing to consider both chains of the HLA-DQ molecule (DQA1 and DQB1) when assessing compatibility 1
- Not accounting for ethnic differences in HLA frequency when interpreting matching probability 1