What is the cutoff for eplet mismatch for someone considered a good match for kidney donation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HLA Eplet Mismatch Cutoffs for Kidney Donation

The optimal cutoff for HLA eplet mismatch in kidney transplantation is <20 total eplet mismatches, with particular emphasis on minimizing HLA-DQ eplet mismatches to <7, as these thresholds are associated with significantly lower risk of rejection, donor-specific antibody formation, and graft failure. 1, 2, 3

Understanding HLA Matching and Eplet Mismatches

HLA matching remains a critical factor in kidney transplantation outcomes despite advances in immunosuppression. While traditional matching focuses on HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR antigens, emerging evidence highlights the importance of eplet-based matching as a more refined approach 4:

  • Eplets are small patches of surface-exposed amino acids on HLA molecules that serve as potential targets for antibody responses 5
  • Traditional antigen matching may miss important immunogenic differences that eplet analysis can detect 2
  • Each additional eplet mismatch increases the risk of rejection in a dose-dependent manner 1, 5

Specific Eplet Mismatch Thresholds

Total Eplet Mismatches

  • Recipients with ≥20 total eplet mismatches have 2.16 times higher risk of acute rejection compared to those with 0-2 eplet mismatches 2
  • Even in patients considered low immunological risk by traditional matching (0-2 broad antigen HLA-ABDR mismatch), those with ≥20 eplet mismatches experience 1.85 times increased rejection risk 2

Class II (HLA-DR and HLA-DQ) Eplet Mismatches

  • HLA class II eplet mismatches, particularly HLA-DQ, are most strongly associated with adverse outcomes 5
  • High HLA-DQ eplet mismatch load (≥7) is associated with significantly higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection compared to low mismatch load (0-1) 3
  • High HLA-DR eplet mismatch load (≥6) similarly increases antibody-mediated rejection risk 3
  • The effect of HLA eplet load on donor-specific antibody formation and graft failure is primarily mediated by eplet mismatches in the HLA-DQ locus 5

Clinical Implications of Exceeding Eplet Mismatch Thresholds

Exceeding these eplet mismatch thresholds has significant consequences:

  • 54-77% of patients with de novo donor-specific antibodies develop antibodies against HLA-DQ 4
  • These antibodies are associated with antibody-mediated rejection, transplant glomerulopathy, and graft loss 4
  • Patients with two HLA-DQ mismatches who experience graft failure often become highly sensitized (>50%), making re-transplantation more difficult 4, 1
  • Each additional mismatch at critical HLA loci can reduce survival by 5-10% depending on disease risk status 1

Monitoring and Management Based on Eplet Mismatch Load

When eplet mismatches exceed recommended thresholds, consider:

  • More intensive immunosuppression protocols 1
  • More frequent monitoring for donor-specific antibodies: weekly for the first month, monthly for 6 months, then quarterly 1
  • Protocol biopsies to detect subclinical rejection, especially in the first year 1
  • Higher target levels of maintenance immunosuppression 1

Important Caveats and Considerations

  • No absolute "safe" threshold exists for HLA-DQ eplet mismatches; the relationship appears linear 5
  • Medication adherence and lower donor-specific antibody strength (MFI <3000) may mitigate some risk in patients with high eplet mismatch loads 6
  • Current allocation systems vary in how they prioritize HLA matching, with some (like Eurotransplant) giving substantial weight to matching and others (like UNOS) giving less emphasis 4
  • Balancing equity of access with optimizing outcomes remains challenging, as strict HLA matching requirements can disadvantage certain ethnic groups 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.