What are the key differences in diagnosis and treatment between Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Key Differences Between Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

The primary distinction between PE and ACS lies in their pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and treatment strategies, with PE requiring immediate anticoagulation while ACS necessitates antiplatelet therapy and potential revascularization.

Diagnostic Differences

Clinical Presentation

  • Symptoms overlap but with key differences:
    • PE typically presents with sudden dyspnea, tachypnea, pleuritic chest pain, and occasionally hemoptysis 1
    • ACS more commonly presents with central chest pain radiating to left arm/jaw, diaphoresis, and nausea 2

Risk Assessment

  • PE:
    • Stratify based on hemodynamic stability (high-risk PE with shock/hypotension vs. non-high-risk PE) 3
    • Further stratify non-high-risk PE into intermediate and low-risk categories 3
  • ACS:
    • Stratify based on ECG changes (ST-elevation vs. non-ST elevation) and biomarkers

Diagnostic Algorithm

For Suspected PE:

  • With hemodynamic instability (high-risk PE):

    • Bedside echocardiography is the most useful initial test 3
    • Evidence of RV dysfunction on echo is sufficient to prompt immediate reperfusion in unstable patients 3
    • Confirm diagnosis with CT angiography once patient is stabilized 3
  • Without hemodynamic instability:

    • Assess clinical probability using validated prediction rules 3
    • Measure D-dimer in low/intermediate probability patients 3
    • Proceed to CTPA if D-dimer positive or high clinical probability 3
    • CTPA is diagnostic if it shows segmental or more proximal filling defect 3
    • Do not measure D-dimer in high clinical probability patients 3

For Suspected ACS:

  • ECG is the initial test of choice
  • Cardiac biomarkers (troponin) are essential
  • Coronary angiography is often needed for definitive diagnosis

Diagnostic Pitfalls

  • PE can mimic ACS on ECG with ST changes and elevated troponin 2
  • Concomitant PE and ACS is rare but possible 4
  • Normal coronary angiogram in a patient with suspected ACS should prompt consideration of PE 5

Treatment Differences

Acute Management

PE Treatment:

  • High-risk PE (with shock/hypotension):

    • Immediate systemic thrombolytic therapy 3
    • Surgical pulmonary embolectomy if thrombolysis is contraindicated or fails 3
    • Initiate IV unfractionated heparin without delay, including weight-adjusted bolus 3
  • Non-high-risk PE:

    • Anticoagulation with preference for LMWH or fondaparinux over UFH 3
    • For oral anticoagulation, prefer NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) 3
    • Alternative: VKA overlapping with parenteral anticoagulation until INR 2.0-3.0 3

ACS Treatment:

  • Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors)
  • Anticoagulation
  • Reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolysis for STEMI)
  • Beta-blockers, statins, ACE inhibitors

Long-term Management

PE:

  • Therapeutic anticoagulation for >3 months for all patients 3
  • Consider discontinuation after 3 months for first PE with transient risk factor 3
  • Continue indefinitely for recurrent VTE not related to transient risk factors 3
  • Reassess drug tolerance, adherence, renal/hepatic function, and bleeding risk regularly 3

ACS:

  • Dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Secondary prevention with statins, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors
  • Lifestyle modifications and risk factor control

Special Considerations

Diagnostic Challenges

  • Differential diagnosis of PE with shock includes:
    • Cardiac tamponade, ACS, aortic dissection, acute valvular dysfunction, and hypovolaemia 3
    • Transoesophageal echocardiography may help visualize thrombi in pulmonary arteries 3

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

  • Do not measure D-dimer in high clinical probability PE patients as negative results don't safely exclude PE 3
  • Do not perform CT venography as an adjunct to CTPA 3
  • Do not routinely administer systemic thrombolysis for intermediate or low-risk PE 3
  • Do not routinely use inferior vena cava filters 3
  • Consider PE in patients with suspected ACS but normal coronary angiogram 5

Pregnancy Considerations

  • Use validated diagnostic methods for suspected PE during pregnancy 3
  • Administer therapeutic, fixed doses of LMWH based on early pregnancy weight 3
  • Do not use NOACs during pregnancy or lactation 3

By understanding these key differences in diagnosis and treatment approaches, clinicians can more effectively differentiate between these two potentially life-threatening conditions and provide appropriate care.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.