What is the BAP (Bilirubin, Albumin, Prothrombin) score in liver disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BAP (Bilirubin, Albumin, Prothrombin) Score in Liver Disease

The BAP score is not a standardized or widely recognized scoring system in liver disease assessment. Instead, these three parameters (bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time) are key components of several established liver prognostic models including the Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and other specialized scoring systems used to evaluate liver function and predict outcomes in various liver diseases.

Key Components and Their Significance

  • Bilirubin: Elevated levels indicate impaired liver excretory function and are associated with poor outcomes in liver disease 1

    • Included in multiple prognostic scores including Child-Pugh, MELD, GAHS, and ABIC 1
    • Serves as a marker of cholestasis and hepatocellular damage 1
  • Albumin: Decreased levels reflect impaired synthetic function of the liver 1

    • Low albumin is an independent prognostic factor for adverse outcomes 2
    • Used in Child-Pugh classification, ALBI score, and other prognostic models 1
  • Prothrombin Time/INR: Prolongation indicates decreased synthesis of clotting factors 1

    • Independent prognostic factor in liver disease 2
    • Component of Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and other liver assessment tools 1

Established Scoring Systems Using These Parameters

1. Child-Pugh Score

  • Incorporates serum albumin, bilirubin, prothrombin time along with clinical assessments of encephalopathy and ascites 1
  • Classifies patients as having compensated (class A) or decompensated (classes B and C) cirrhosis 1
  • Advantages include ease of performance (can be done at bedside) and inclusion of clinical parameters 1

2. MELD Score

  • Uses bilirubin, creatinine, and INR (derived from prothrombin time) 1
  • Numerical scale from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) 1
  • Originally developed for assessing mortality risk in TIPS procedures, now used for liver transplant prioritization 1
  • Includes renal function assessment, which is not in the Child-Pugh score 1

3. ALBI Score

  • Uses only albumin and bilirubin levels 1
  • Shown to be superior to MELD in predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure and mortality in some studies 3
  • Can subdivide Child-Pugh A patients into better (ALBI-1) and worse (ALBI-2) prognostic groups 1

4. Disease-Specific Scores

  • Alcoholic Hepatitis: Modified Discriminant Function (mDF), GAHS, and ABIC scores all incorporate these parameters 1
  • Primary Biliary Cirrhosis: GLOBE score includes total bilirubin, albumin, and platelet count 1

Clinical Applications

  • Prognosis Assessment: These parameters help predict survival in various liver diseases 1, 2
  • Treatment Decision-Making: Scores guide therapeutic interventions, particularly in alcoholic hepatitis 1
  • Transplant Prioritization: MELD score is used by UNOS to stratify patients on liver transplant waiting lists 1
  • Surgical Risk Assessment: ALBI and PALBI scores predict post-hepatectomy outcomes 3, 4

Limitations and Considerations

  • No single scoring system is perfect; each has advantages and limitations 1
  • The relative value of different scoring systems varies by clinical context and specific liver disease 3, 2
  • Dynamic assessment (changes in parameters over time) may provide better prognostic information than single measurements 1, 5
  • Some newer models have incorporated additional parameters for improved accuracy 4

While "BAP score" is not a standard term in hepatology, these three parameters (bilirubin, albumin, prothrombin time) form the cornerstone of liver function assessment and are integral components of validated prognostic models used in clinical practice.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.